Just and Sinner Podcast An Explanation of the Lutheran Doctrine of the Lord's Supper
Aug 6, 2014
Dive into the fascinating world of the Lord's Supper as various theological perspectives collide! Explore the Lutheran rejection of consubstantiation and discover Aquinas's views on transubstantiation. Justin contrasts Zwingli's purely symbolic interpretation with Calvin's nuanced approach of real participation. Delve into how Christology shapes Eucharistic views and the debate over 'in, with, and under' language. Plus, a look at the paradox of resistible grace awaits! This thought-provoking discussion sets the stage for an enlightening trilogy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Supper As Lutheran Identity
- Lutheranism treats the Lord's Supper as its most distinctive doctrine among Protestants.
- Justin Center plans a multi-part series to explain the Lutheran view and contrasts with other traditions.
Why 'Consubstantiation' Is Rejected
- Lutherans reject the label 'consubstantiation' because it implies a medieval third-substance mixing.
- They prefer terms like 'real presence' or 'sacramental union' to avoid that confusion.
Four Eucharistic Positions
- Four broad historical views shape Eucharistic debate: transubstantiation, Zwinglian symbolism, Calvinistic mediation, and Lutheran sacramental union.
- Each view answers how Christ's body and blood relate to bread and wine differently.
