Weight of the world revisited: the climate scientists who copped it
Jan 3, 2024
auto_awesome
Three Australian climate scientists, Lesley Hughes, Graeme Pearman, and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, talk about the professional and personal toll of their climate change predictions. They discuss the axing of Australia's Climate Commission, pushback from government and industry, personal attacks and death threats they faced, skepticism towards climate science, the importance of being scientist advocates, and the responsibility to find solutions for climate change.
The axing of Australia's Climate Commission hindered the public's education on climate science and carbon emissions.
Climate scientists faced personal attacks and death threats, but remained committed to communicating the scientific facts and advocating for evidence-based decision making.
Deep dives
The Climate Commission is established to inform the Australian public about climate change
In the midst of Australia's climate wars, the Climate Commission is established by Julia Gillard's Labour government to educate the Australian public about climate change. Comprised of scientists and experts, including Leslie Hughes and Tim Flannery, the commission's role is to explain climate science and the implications of carbon pricing. They conduct community meetings to engage with people and answer their questions, particularly addressing the difference between natural climate variability and climate trends. Despite some pushback, the town hall meetings receive generally positive receptions, fostering genuine inquiry and expanding the understanding of climate change in different communities.
Scientists face challenges and attacks for their climate change predictions
Graham Pearman, Leslie Hughes, and Ove Goldberg, all respected climate scientists, face pushback and attacks as they present their predictions and scientific evidence on climate change. Pearman experiences pressure to not express his knowledge on the science and thinks that government pressure was placed on the CSIRO to downplay climate change. Goldberg faces skepticism and opposition when he predicts the danger climate change poses to coral reefs. They receive death threats and criticism from climate change deniers, but remain committed to communicating the scientific facts and advocating for evidence-based decision making.
The Climate Commission is abolished, leading to the establishment of the Climate Council
When Tony Abbott becomes the Prime Minister of Australia, he abolishes the Climate Commission, the organization tasked with educating the public about climate change. However, the closure of the commission does not deter the scientists. Tim Flannery rallies the team to establish the Climate Council through public donations, raising 1.2 million in the first week. The council continues their work of communicating climate science, advocating for policy change, and informing the public on the urgent need for action. They feel a weight of responsibility due to the expectations of their supporters and the critical nature of their mission.
Scientists navigate the role of advocacy amidst political polarization
The scientists discuss the delicate balance between advocacy and presenting scientific information. While they recognize the importance of advocating for science-based policy, they also emphasize the need to remain independent and focus on presenting the science accurately. They acknowledge the criticism and skepticism they face and reflect on their motivations, determined to save the world from climate change. They strive to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and public understanding, highlighting that their role is to provide facts and engage in informed discussions rather than pushing personal agendas.
Science Weekly revisits episode two of this 2023 mini-series from Full Story. In part two of Weight of the world, three Australian climate scientists reveal the professional and personal toll of their predictions. Lesley Hughes tells us about the axing of Australia’s Climate Commission, a group tasked with educating the public about climate science and the need to cut carbon emissions; Graeme Pearman talks of the pushback from government and industry; and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg speaks of the personal attacks and death threats that followed his warnings. All three express their disbelief that meaningful action didn’t follow the science, with Pearman saying he was ‘naive’ to think it would. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/sciencepod
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode