Join New Zealand comedian Josh Thomson, known for his sharp wit on shows like Taskmaster, as he chats with the hosts about a wild array of topics. They delve into bizarre animal misidentifications that are both hilarious and eye-opening. Josh shares insights on unique local legends, including a racing horse with Kiwi roots. They also explore quirky citizenship laws and the amusing tales of diplomatic gifts. Lastly, a peculiar World War One conspiracy unfolds, blending humor with historical oddities.
Richard Pearce, a New Zealand farmer, achieved powered flight before the Wright brothers but lacked recognition due to poor documentation.
Farlap's legacy reflects the complex national heritage between New Zealand and Australia, showcasing both countries' pride in their shared history.
The bizarre legal case of Crown Princess Juliana illustrates how unusual laws can shape national identity and international relations during significant events.
Deep dives
Richard Pearce: The True Pioneer of Flight
The first powered flight was achieved not by the Wright brothers but by Richard Pearce, a New Zealand farmer. In March 1903, Pearce constructed his aircraft from local materials, including bamboo and tobacco cans, and successfully flew it in Temaru, New Zealand. While the Wright brothers have extensive documentation and photographs of their flight later that year, Pearce's lack of publicity and record-keeping meant his achievement went largely unrecognized. Despite this, his design influenced future aircraft development more than many are aware.
The Legacy of Farlap
Farlap, an iconic racehorse in Australian history, was born in Timaru, New Zealand, and became a national treasure despite being occasionally overshadowed by the Australian narrative. His story includes a dramatic transformation from a neglected, wart-covered horse to a celebrated champion, ultimately leading to his acquisition by a trainer who believed in his potential. Following his death, Farlap's remains were fragmented, with his heart kept in Australia while parts of his skeleton reside in New Zealand, reflecting the complexities of national heritage. The conflicting claims over Farlap’s legacy highlight how both nations passionately embrace their shared historical contexts.
Dutch Princess and Extraterritoriality
In 1940, Crown Princess Juliana of the Netherlands was in Canada when she became pregnant, prompting a peculiar legal situation regarding her unborn child. To ensure the legitimacy of the child's claim to the Dutch throne, lawyers declared that wherever the princess stood did not constitute foreign soil, effectively making it Dutch territory. This unusual extraterritorial law was enacted to prevent the child's birth from being recognized as occurring abroad. Juliana later expressed her gratitude to Canada with a gift of 100,000 tulip bulbs, an act that established a long tradition between the two nations.
The Misidentification of a Marine Snail
The marine snail Littorina saxatilis holds the dubious title of being the most misidentified creature in the world, having been wrongly classified numerous times since its description in 1792. Its considerable genetic variation allows for a diverse array of appearances, leading scientists to mistakenly identify it as different species repeatedly. This phenomenon extends to the broader field of taxonomy, illustrating challenges in species classification which could reshape our understanding of biodiversity. As researchers continue to untangle these identities, the potential for discovering new species and correcting historical records remains vast.
The Conspiracy of Highly Placed English Perverts
During World War I, a bizarre conspiracy theory emerged alleging that Germany possessed a list of 47,000 high-ranking British individuals who could be blackmailed due to their sexual preferences. This notion fed into anti-German sentiment and was used to discredit and terrorize perceived social deviants, intertwining morality with wartime propaganda. Notably, Maud Allen, an actress linked to the scandal, faced significant media scrutiny and defamation, which underlined the hysteria surrounding the supposed infiltration of British society. The incident reflects how war can warp social dynamics and mobilize baseless claims in the name of national security.