Strict Scrutiny The Supreme Court’s ‘Lawless’ Era
46 snips
May 12, 2025 
In this engaging discussion, Amanda Litman, co-founder of Run for Something and author of 'When We're in Charge,' delves into the challenges facing today’s leaders, especially among millennials and Gen Z. She explores the impact of the Supreme Court's recent decisions on democracy and civil rights, emphasizing the need for accountability. Litman also shares insights on sustainable leadership, navigating authenticity in workplace dynamics, and the importance of strategic communication to drive meaningful change. Plus, who knew Taylor Swift could factor into Supreme Court discussions?
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Court Operates on Conservative Vibes
- The Supreme Court under conservatives operates on sentiments and political views favoring the Republican Party.
- This reflects a larger project where the court adopts fringe conservative agendas over broad societal interests.
Selective Legalism Reveals Endgame
- Conservative justices use selective legalism to impose rules benefiting their agenda.
- This strategy disempowers opposing views, revealing their goal to equate rule of law with Republican rule.
Beyond Originalism: Legal Parroting
- The court's radical anti-democratic moves extend beyond originalism to parroting political talking points as legal doctrine.
- This judicial activism supports rollback of rights and power for marginalized groups.
