Asheesh Kapur Siddique, "The Archive of Empire: Knowledge, Conquest, and the Making of the Early Modern British World" (Yale UP, 2024)
Feb 19, 2025
auto_awesome
Asheesh Kapur Siddique, an assistant professor of history specializing in early modern Europe and the British Empire, delves into the complex relationships between knowledge, governance, and imperialism. He explores how the British utilized archives to manage their expansive empire across continents. Siddique discusses the adaptation of local practices in regions like Quebec and Bengal and the transformation of archives from concealed documents to accessible public records. His insights reveal the intricate interplay between information, power, and cultural identity in shaping historical narratives.
The advent of paper revolutionized bureaucratic processes in the British Empire, facilitating more efficient documentation and communication across vast territories.
The representation of non-British populations in imperial archives showcases power dynamics, revealing selective documentation practices that marginalized their identities and agency.
Deep dives
Transformative Role of Paper in Governance
Paper revolutionized the way information was recorded and shared across the expanding British Empire, enabling complex bureaucratic processes. Before the widespread use of paper, parchment was the primary medium for documentation, making the administration cumbersome due to its laborious production. The advent of paper, made from linen rags, allowed for quicker documentation and communication, which was essential for governing vast territories. By leveraging this new medium, officials could maintain significant distances in bureaucratic operations, corresponding effectively across continents and ensuring directives were executed with greater efficiency.
Impact of Archived Information on Colonial Administration
The collection and management of information became crucial for both the East India Company and the Board of Trade in monitoring colonial governance. Officials were required to submit reports concerning trade compliance and local conditions, creating a cycle of bureaucratic documentation that could sometimes feel tedious. This reporting process not only allowed for the consolidation of power but also facilitated a culture of accountability, where the compliance of officials was constantly scrutinized through written records. The reliance on formal documentation helped establish a governance structure that relied heavily on data, reflecting a growing bureaucratic ethos that was characteristic of the empire.
Exclusion and Representation in Imperial Archives
The way non-British populations, such as Native Americans and enslaved Africans, were recorded in imperial archives highlights issues of representation and power dynamics within the empire. Native Americans were often treated as diplomatic entities rather than subjects, leading to minimal documentation about their societies unless related to conflict or treaties. Conversely, the enslaved population was commodified, appearing in records primarily as 'merchantable property' rather than individuals with agency or identity. This selective documentation underscores how the imperial archive was constructed through processes that reflected colonial values and power relations, significantly shaping historical narratives.
Evolving Perspectives on Archival Practices
The late 18th and early 19th centuries marked a significant shift in how British officials and the public viewed archives, transitioning from secretive repositories to accessible public records. This change resulted from the growing emphasis on historical documentation for scholarly and genealogical purposes, with increasing public pressure for access to governmental documents. By the mid-19th century, the British government explicitly allowed individuals to consult records for various purposes, leading to the creation of a public record office. This evolution reflects a broader reconceptualization of archives, where previously closed-off information became crucial for transparency and accountability in governance.
Over the span of two hundred years, Great Britain established, governed, lost, and reconstructed an empire that embraced three continents and two oceanic worlds. The British ruled this empire by correlating incoming information about the conduct of subjects and aliens in imperial spaces with norms of good governance developed in London. Officials derived these norms by studying the histories of government contained in the official records of both the state and corporations and located in repositories known as archives.
As the empire expanded in both the Americas and India, however, this system of political knowledge came to be regarded as inadequate in governing the non-English people who inhabited the lands over which the British asserted sovereignty. This posed a key problem for imperial officials: What kind of knowledge was required to govern an empire populated by a growing number of culturally different people? Using files, pens, and paper, the British defined the information order of the modern state as they debated answers to this question. In tracing the rise and deployment of archives in early modern British imperial rule, in The Archive of Empire: Knowledge, Conquest, and the Making of the Early Modern British World (Yale University Press, 2024) Dr. Asheesh Kapur Siddique uncovers the origins of our data-driven present.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.