Katya Schwenk, a reporter at The Lever, dives into the frozen potato industry's surprising price-fixing controversies. She reveals how a handful of companies potentially collude to control prices, sparked by alarming hikes noticed by a bar owner. The discussion highlights systemic challenges in food pricing and the troubling effects of algorithmic pricing on market fairness. Schwenk sheds light on the urgent need for stronger anti-monopoly measures, urging listeners to consider the broader economic implications of these practices.
The consolidation of the frozen potato industry into four major companies has led to allegations of price fixing affecting restaurants and grocery stores.
Proposed legislation aims to clarify antitrust laws to combat algorithmic collusion and protect consumers from unfair pricing practices in various sectors.
Deep dives
Consolidation and Price Fixing in the Frozen Potato Market
The frozen potato market is highly consolidated, with only four major companies controlling 97% of the industry. This lack of competition has led to accusations of price fixing, as evidenced by a bar owner named Josh Saltzman who noticed simultaneous price increases from his suppliers. His frustration led him to tweet about these suspicious patterns, and two years later, his observations were referenced in lawsuits against these companies, claiming that their collusion harmed profits for restaurants and grocery stores. This case highlights the overarching issues in the agricultural supply chain, where a few powerful firms can manipulate prices away from competitive market norms.
Algorithmic Collusion and the Housing Market
Beyond frozen potatoes, price-setting algorithms are reportedly impacting various sectors, including housing. Companies such as RealPage allegedly use algorithms to manipulate rental prices, effectively colluding to set higher rates and limit the availability of rental properties. This sophisticated form of price fixing falls under the scrutiny of antitrust laws, as the mechanism resembles past illegal practices without direct meetings between competitors. The government is challenged to adapt existing regulations to address these modern practices, which could lead to further exploitation of consumers in essential markets.
Legislative Responses to Anti-Competitive Practices
In response to the growing concerns around algorithmic collusion, legislation is being proposed to clarify and enhance antitrust laws. Senator Amy Klobuchar has introduced bills aimed at making collusion through data-sharing platforms explicitly illegal, addressing how companies can use algorithms without undermining competition. These measures highlight the need for updated legal frameworks that reflect current market dynamics, where secret data exchanges facilitate price manipulation. By pushing for accountability, lawmakers are hoping to ensure fairer pricing and protect consumers from undue exploitation in various industries.
The prices of all kinds of things have stayed stubbornly high even as inflation has cooled. And a spate of lawsuits point to algorithmic price fixing as the culprit. Just look at frozen potatoes.
This episode was produced by Peter Balanon-Rosen with help from Devan Schwartz, edited by Jolie Myers, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Bpyd and Andrea Kristinsdottir, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram.