Latif Nasser, co-host of Radiolab, engages with former Senator Gary Hart about the seismic shift caused by his 1987 sex scandal. They dive into how this incident reshaped political journalism and public perception of candidates. The conversation highlights the evolving standards of media scrutiny and ethical dilemmas reporters face covering personal scandals. With Donald Trump's possible return to office, they question whether such scandals still hold weight in today's political climate, reflecting on the changing dynamics of accountability in public life.
The Gary Hart scandal marked a pivotal shift in political journalism, where personal conduct began to significantly impact candidates' public images and reputations.
Today's political landscape mirrors that of the Hart era, characterized by heightened partisan divides and a media environment that often sensationalizes personal allegations over substantive issues.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Political Journalism
Political journalism has undergone significant changes over the years, particularly following pivotal events such as Watergate and the candidacy of Gary Hart. In the past, candidates' private lives were often considered off-limits, with media ethics dictating that political leaders were entitled to a degree of privacy. However, the Hart campaign exemplified a shift where personal conduct began to impact candidates' public images, driven by a new breed of reporters prioritizing character over policy. This transformation highlighted a trend where moral failings became critical narratives, with the Hart affair marking a turning point in how political journalism approached its subjects.
The Gary Hart Scandal: A Case Study
The Gary Hart scandal in 1987 serves as a significant example of how personal behavior intertwined with political candidacy. Initially a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, Hart's campaign unraveled when allegations emerged of his extramarital affair, following a tip received by journalists. Reporters conducted surveillance to confirm the affair, leading to a watershed moment wherein Hart's denials clashed violently with media revelations. Hart's eventual withdrawal from the race underscored the increasingly invasive nature of political reporting and the consequences of personal actions on public perception.
The Impact of Gender on Media Coverage
The dynamics of media coverage, particularly in the context of gender, shifted notably during the Hart scandal as female reporters became more prominent in political journalism. These reporters not only enhanced the scrutiny of male candidates’ behaviors but also brought attention to how public figures like Hart interacted with women. The women's movement played a crucial role in reshaping perceptions of character in political contexts, suggesting that the treatment of women was indicative of broader ethical considerations. This evolving landscape implied that candidates’ personal lives were fair game for analysis and scrutiny, expanding the criteria for assessing a candidate's fitness for office.
Cynical Politics and Media Distraction Today
Today's political landscape bears resemblance to the era of Gary Hart, yet it is marked by a greater level of cynicism and partisan division. Voters have become more entrenched in their ideological identities, often disregarding serious allegations against candidates if they align with partisan interests. The media, struggling to adapt to this environment, frequently intensifies the sensationalism surrounding stories, which distracts from substantive issues. This relationship between a hyper-partisan electorate and a media ecosystem captivated by distraction suggests a troubling trajectory for future political discourse and journalistic integrity.
With Trump’s imminent return to the White House, we’ve decided to take stock of how political and journalistic norms have evolved over the years. For this week’s midweek podcast, we’re sharing an episode from Radiolab that aired in October, on the whirlwind history of Gary Hart, a young charismatic Democrat who in 1987 was poised to win his party’s nomination and possibly the presidency – until a bombshell sex scandal derailed it all. Brooke Gladstone and Radiolab co-host Latif Nasser discuss that history, and why sex scandals don’t really matter anymore.
On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode