Ismar Volić, a mathematics professor and director at the Institute for Mathematics and Democracy, along with economics PhD student Victoria Mooers, dive into how math influences voting. They dissect the flaws of the current plurality voting system and propose preference ranking methods to reduce polarization. The conversation also touches on Liquid Democracy and the complications that arise from too much delegation in voting processes. Listen in as they illuminate the vital relationship between mathematics and effective democracy.
The podcast critiques the plurality voting system for failing to represent voter preferences accurately, often resulting in outcomes that don't reflect the electorate's true will.
Alternative voting systems like ranked choice voting can mitigate the issues of wasted votes and vote splitting, enhancing the representativeness of electoral outcomes.
Deep dives
The Importance of Voting Systems
Voting systems are essential mechanisms by which individual preferences are combined to determine collective choices, typically in elections. The discussion highlights that the common voting system used in the United States, known as plurality or first-past-the-post, claims to reflect democratic choice but often fails to do so. This system allows candidates with less than a majority to win, exemplified by recent presidential elections where winners had less than 50% of the total votes. Such shortcomings reveal that plurality voting can misrepresent the electorate's true preferences and lead to a disconnect between the election results and the will of the people.
Issues with Plurality Voting
The plurality voting system is criticized for creating several significant issues, such as wasted votes and vote splitting, which can distort electoral outcomes. A notable example discussed is the case of a mayor recalled for corruption who was subsequently reelected, illustrating how voters' preferences can be undermined by the structure of plurality voting. Polling shows that in elections with multiple candidates, a winner may emerge without receiving a majority of the total votes, leading to the conclusion that plurality fails to effectively represent voter sentiment. Additionally, the system fosters negative campaigning, as candidates may prioritize attacks on opponents rather than promoting their agendas.
Alternatives to Plurality Voting
Mathematical research has led to the exploration of alternative voting systems that could potentially address the pitfalls of plurality voting. Ranked choice voting, also known as instant runoff, is one suggested system that allows voters to rank candidates, potentially leading to more representative outcomes. Other methods discussed include Borda Count and Condorcet methods, which aim to consider voters' preferences more comprehensively and can mitigate issues such as vote splitting. The podcast emphasizes that while no voting system is perfect, evidence suggests that instant runoff voting has shown promise in real-world applications, producing more favorable election results than plurality.
Direct Democracy and Liquid Democracy
Direct democracy is presented as a model where voters have a say on every policy decision, allowing for a more transparent expression of the electorate's will. The podcast introduces the concept of liquid democracy, which combines elements of direct and representative democracy by allowing voters to delegate their voting power to someone they trust on specific issues. This model could enhance participation and accountability in decision-making processes. However, evidence suggests that over-reliance on delegation can lead to poor outcomes, raising important questions about the balance between direct voter participation and the effectiveness of delegating votes.
IMSI is very proud to announce that Carry the Two is back and with a new co-host, IMSI’s new Director of Communications and Engagement Sam Hansen!
We in the United States are deep in the middle of a major national election, and over half of the world’s population also have elections in 2024. This is why Carry the Two is going to focus on the intersection of mathematics and democracy for our new season.
In this episode, the first episode of our mathematics and democracy season, we speak with mathematician Ismar Volić of Wellesley College and Director of the Institute for Mathematics and Democracy and Victoria Mooers, an economics PhD student at Columbia University. We discuss what mathematics has to say about our current plurality voting system, how switching to preference ranking votings systems could limit polarization and negative campaigning, and why too much delegation causes problems for those pushing for Liquid Democracy.