Vanessa Rancaño, a housing affordability reporter at KQED, and Emily Schultheis, a California reporter for Politico, dive deep into Propositions 33 and 34 on California's November ballot. They discuss how Prop 33 could empower cities to implement rent control, significantly affecting housing affordability. Meanwhile, Prop 34's controversial funding restrictions raise questions about its impact on the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. The conversation also explores the heated debate surrounding these propositions and their potential implications for California residents.
Proposition 33 seeks to empower California cities to enact rent control by repealing the restrictive Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act.
Proposition 34 aims to limit healthcare providers' expenditure of federal drug discount funds, specifically targeting the AIDS Healthcare Foundation's housing initiatives.
Deep dives
Proposition 33: Empowering Local Rent Control
Proposition 33 aims to give cities and counties more authority to impose rent control by repealing the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which has limited local governments since 1995. This proposition would allow local entities to regulate rents on single-family homes, condos, and properties built after 1995, potentially enabling broader rent control measures. Polling indicates a shift in voter attitudes, with a recent survey showing 51% support for the proposition, up from significant rejections in previous elections. The rising rent burdens faced by California tenants, with nearly half of renters stating they are rent-burdened, have reinvigorated discussions around this measure, reflecting deepening concerns over housing affordability.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation's Role
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation has been a significant force behind Proposition 33, previously sponsoring two failed rent control measures. This organization, which also owns a considerable amount of low-income housing in Los Angeles, is motivated by its mission to provide affordable housing alongside healthcare services. With over $39 million contributed to Prop 33, the foundation aims to ensure that rent control policies support lower-income populations amid California's soaring rental prices. However, this involvement has drawn opposition from landlord groups who argue that such measures could threaten investments in housing and create disincentives to maintain properties.
Proposition 34: Healthcare Spending Restrictions
Proposition 34 would mandate that certain healthcare providers spend nearly all funds obtained from a federal drug discount program directly on patient care, leaving little to allocate for housing or other services. This measure specifically targets the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which, due to its past spending on housing, could lose the ability to support its affordable housing projects if the proposition passes. The proposition eloquently ties healthcare funding to patient care, effectively challenging the foundation’s alternative usage of the funds for housing support initiatives. Although it presents itself as a health policy, this measure is viewed by some as a strategic move to restrict the operations of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, reflecting the intersection of healthcare and housing issues.
The Clash of Interests: Real Estate and Healthcare
The opposition to Proposition 33 is heavily financed by the California Apartment Association, which has a vested interest in the outcomes of both propositions. Their backing of Proposition 34 further complicates the narrative, as it highlights a push to limit the power of organizations like the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which competes with them in the housing market. As the election approaches, significant funds have been poured into advertising campaigns on both sides, indicating a high-stakes battle over voter perceptions regarding housing solutions. Citizens are left to navigate complex motivations underlining each proposition, questioning who truly benefits and how deeply intertwined healthcare and rental policies are within California's broader housing crisis.
We take a look at Propositions 33 and 34 on California’s November ballot and how they’re connected. Prop 33 would remove limits on cities’ ability to enact rent control laws, and is heavily backed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Prop 34 would restrict how specific health care providers can spend their money. Opponents of 34 claim that it’s designed to kneecap one organization: the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. We learn more and take your questions.