

Rational Security: The “F*cked by Five” Edition
Oct 8, 2025
This week, Daniel Byman, a foreign policy and national security expert, Loren Voss, a public service fellow with a focus on military legality, and Tyler McBrien, managing editor at Lawfare, dive into pressing national security issues. They discuss legal implications of deploying federal troops in U.S. cities, evaluate a potential peace deal for Gaza, and analyze U.S. actions towards Venezuela. The conversation unveils the complexities of domestic military use, international diplomacy, and the geopolitical landscape, all peppered with sharp insights and analysis.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Deployments Driven By Unclear Facts
- The Portland and Chicago deployments mirror the California model but on shakier factual grounds and smaller force sizes.
- Lack of clear predicate facts and mixed legal authorities make these domestic troop uses novel and legally fraught.
Courts Must Sift Facts From Rhetoric
- Courts face a difficult fact-fighting role because public rhetoric diverges from the Justice Department's narrower legal claims.
- Judges may reject the low-deference standard the administration expects when the factual record is weak.
Shifting Terrorism Landscape And 'Antifa' Label
- Terrorism trends have shifted: right-wing attacks fell while left-wing attacks ticked up recently, though totals remain low.
- 'Antifa' functions as a rhetorical label, not a formal organization, complicating legal and policy responses.