Amanda Taub, human rights lawyer-turned-journalist, discusses the South Africa-Israel genocide case and the power of international war rules. Topics covered include the importance of international law, Israel's defense in the case, the significance of international rules in the conflict in Gaza, and the consequences of violating war rules.
The case filed by South Africa against Israel in the International Court of Justice highlights the significance of international law as a framework for understanding conflicts.
South Africa accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza based on demonstrated intent to destroy the civilian population, as defined by the Genocide Convention.
Deep dives
Retirement Plan: More Than Just Saving
Retirement planning should prioritize the individual's passions and interests. Instead of focusing solely on financial savings, it is important to ask what activities the person loves doing and how they can continue doing them. Lincoln Financial can help create action plans that align with an individual's passion, whether it's hiking, music, or sailing.
South Africa's Accusation of Genocide Against Israel in Gaza
South Africa has filed an application with the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of violating its obligations under the Genocide Convention in Gaza. This case highlights the significance of international law as a neutral framework for understanding conflicts. The ICJ will determine if Israel has violated the treaty. South Africa's motivation for bringing the case lies in its history and political support for the Palestinian cause.
The Case before the International Court of Justice
The International Court of Justice is considering South Africa's accusation of genocide by Israel in Gaza. The case is based on South Africa's claim that Israel has violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention. Hamas is not part of the case since the ICJ only hears disputes between states. The case brings attention to the relevance of international law as a means of understanding conflicts and holding parties accountable.
Understanding Genocide and Intent
South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza based on actions and statements that demonstrate intent to destroy the civilian population, as defined by the Genocide Convention. Intent to destroy a group, in whole or in part, is the key factor in defining genocide. It is not solely based on the level of violence, but rather the intention behind the actions. South Africa presents evidence of specific statements made by Israeli officials to support their claim.
In the International Court of Justice, South Africa is accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
Amanda Taub, a human rights lawyer-turned-journalist at The Times, walks through the arguments of the case, and the power that the rules of war have beyond any verdict in court.
Guest: Amanda Taub, writer of The Interpreter for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode