The Daily The Rules of War
77 snips
Jan 22, 2024 
Amanda Taub, a writer for The New York Times and former human rights lawyer, dives into the controversial case where South Africa accuses Israel of genocide in Gaza. She unpacks the intricate definitions of genocide and the motivations behind South Africa's legal challenge, relating it to its apartheid history. The conversation touches on the humanitarian crisis and the complexities of international law, emphasizing the critical need for universally accepted rules of engagement in warfare to maintain accountability and moral clarity.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ICJ Case
- The International Court of Justice is considering South Africa's accusation of genocide against Israel in Gaza.
- International law offers a neutral framework for understanding the conflict.
Case Focus and South Africa's Role
- The case focuses on Israel's actions, not Hamas's, due to the ICJ's jurisdiction over states and treaty obligations.
- South Africa's involvement stems from their status as a signatory to the Genocide Convention and their historical support for Palestine.
Defining Genocide
- Genocide is defined by the intent to destroy a group, not solely the scale of violence.
- South Africa alleges Israel committed actions and condoned statements inciting genocide.