Franco Ordoñez, a White House correspondent for NPR, and Fred Kaplan, Slate’s war stories correspondent, delve into the intriguing challenges facing USAID. They explore why the agency, vital for humanitarian support, is under scrutiny and its funding facing freezes. The discussion covers the historical role of USAID in diplomacy, contrasting it with military interventions. They also touch on the organization's turbulent past, particularly during the Trump era, and examine how external critiques, including from figures like Elon Musk, have shaped its future.
USAID plays a vital role in global humanitarian aid and U.S. foreign relations, despite its limited budget and ongoing mismanagement issues.
The potential shutdown of USAID could severely impact vulnerable populations and undermine U.S. reputation as a supportive global ally.
Deep dives
The Role and Significance of USAID
USAID, established in 1961, plays a crucial role in delivering humanitarian aid and foreign assistance globally, addressing issues like poverty and health crises. The agency's mission extends beyond aid; it also serves U.S. national interests and fosters alliances through its programs. Critics argue that it has been mismanaged and hijacked by political agendas, especially during Republican administrations that seek to increase control over its operations. Despite having a relatively small budget, the agency's impact on global diplomacy and humanitarian efforts highlights the need for its existence, especially in countering foreign influences such as those from China.
Recent Developments and Internal Chaos at USAID
Recent developments surrounding USAID have caused significant internal turmoil, primarily due to actions taken by the current administration. Reports indicate that employees have been placed on administrative leave and denied access to their offices, resulting in emotional distress among staff. Furthermore, high-profile individuals such as Donald Trump and Elon Musk have openly criticized the agency, leading to concerns about its future and operational capacity. The uncertainty within the organization raises questions about the ongoing support for vital humanitarian programs that have historically been funded by USAID.
The Broader Implications of USAID's Potential Shutdown
The potential shutdown of USAID could have dire humanitarian consequences, particularly for vulnerable populations relying on its assistance. Without its funding, numerous programs essential for combating infectious diseases, providing food aid, and supporting refugees may be halted, further destabilizing already fragile regions. This situation could also damage the U.S.'s reputation as a benevolent global power, transforming perceptions from that of a supportive ally to an imperialistic force. In the long term, the consequences of USAID's elimination might manifest in increased global instability and further challenges for U.S. foreign relations.
Why did the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which gives money to humanitarian causes around the world and accounts for roughly half of one percent of the federal budget, end up in DOGE’s crosshairs? And is its abrupt closure legal?
Guests: Franco Ordoñez, White House Correspondent for NPR. Fred Kaplan, Slate’s war stories correspondent.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.