Understanding the CFPB's Proposed Digital Payments Larger Participants Rule and Its Implications for Digital Assets
Mar 14, 2024
auto_awesome
Ethan Ostroff, a seasoned expert on digital payment regulations, joins James Kim, who specializes in the intersection of digital assets and consumer protection, and Carlin McCrory, a professional analyzing regulatory impacts on tech giants. They unpack the CFPB's proposed rule that classifies digital assets as 'funds,' raising questions about the Bureau's authority and its implications for large tech firms. They also discuss potential challenges for companies navigating these new regulations, including the treatment of NFTs and monitoring blockchain transactions.
The CFPB's proposed rule extends its authority over digital assets, categorizing them as consumer financial products under existing federal laws.
Legal concerns arise over the CFPB's jurisdiction, particularly regarding the definition of 'funds' and compliance challenges for digital asset companies.
Deep dives
CFPB's Expansion into Digital Assets
The proposed payments rule from the CFPB aims to extend its supervisory authority to digital asset accounts, categorizing them as consumer financial products. Under this rule, large tech companies and digital wallets facilitating transactions involving crypto assets would be subjected to the same examination processes as traditional banks. This move is particularly significant as it indicates a shift towards regulatory scrutiny over the rapidly evolving digital asset market, potentially impacting companies like Amazon and Google. As the CFPB equates digital assets with funds, this broader classification could lead to a sprawling regulatory landscape for digital transactions.
Jurisdictional Challenges and Legal Considerations
The discussion highlights critical legal concerns regarding the CFPB's claim to jurisdiction over digital assets, primarily focused on the definition of 'funds' under Dodd-Frank. Critics argue that the CFPB's position lacks robust legal backing since Dodd-Frank excludes firms regulated by the SEC or CFTC, which oversee many crypto assets. Legal precedents are insufficient to support the CFPB's stance, especially given the ongoing disputes about digital assets' classifications as securities or commodities. Furthermore, the application of the major questions doctrine suggests that such significant jurisdictional claims should be explicitly stated by Congress rather than inferred.
Implications for Industry and Future Developments
The upcoming regulation poses practical challenges for digital asset companies, notably regarding tracking consumer payment transactions, particularly if they handle anonymous trades. The CFPB's recent rule suggests a threshold of at least five million annual transactions, raising compliance costs and operational adjustments for businesses. Companies may face increased scrutiny and need additional resources to comply with potential safety measures regarding consumer data. With the final rule expected soon, firms in the digital asset space must prepare for potential oversight and align their operations with the shifting regulatory expectations.
In this special crossover episode with Payments Pros and The Crypto Exchange, Ethan Ostroff, James Kim, and Carlin McCrory discuss the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) proposed rule to supervise large tech companies and other providers of digital wallets and payment apps. The proposed rule asserts that digital assets are "funds" subject to the Dodd-Frank Act and other federal consumer financial laws and regulations, which would expand the CFPB's supervisory powers to examine companies facilitating crypto and other digital asset transactions.
Our group discusses the legal basis for the CFPB's assertion of jurisdiction over digital assets, and observes that the CFPB's position lacks clear statutory authority and may violate the major questions doctrine. They also note that Congress is currently working on legislation related to digital assets, and that the CFPB should not preempt this process.
Lastly, the group highlights practical questions that companies face when assessing the proposed rule, such as whether NFTs are covered and how companies can monitor anonymous, blockchain transactions.
The final rule is anticipated to be released before year end, with examinations starting in 2025.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode