

The Supreme Court’s power grab
21 snips Jul 10, 2024
Ian Millhiser, a Vox writer and expert on the Supreme Court, discusses the court's recent significant shifts. He analyzes how rulings are reshaping federal agency power, particularly the overruling of the Chevron doctrine. Millhiser raises alarms about the court's increasing involvement in trivial legal matters and its implications for governance. Additionally, he highlights the trend of citizens turning to the Supreme Court for disputes with federal agencies, stressing the need for informed voter influence over judicial decisions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Chevron Doctrine
- The Supreme Court's Chevron Doctrine, established in 1984, dictated that courts defer to federal agencies on policy decisions.
- This doctrine was initially favored by Republicans during the Reagan era.
Chevron Doctrine Origins
- The Chevron Doctrine originated from a case about the Clean Air Act, specifically the term "stationary sources."
- Different administrations interpreted this term differently, leading to the Supreme Court's decision to defer to agencies.
Chevron Doctrine Controversy
- Despite initial bipartisan support, the Chevron Doctrine became controversial during the Obama administration.
- Conservatives, through the Federalist Society, began advocating for its repeal to limit the Obama administration's power.