Prof. Dr. Sepp Hochreiter discusses xLSTM, the European answer to ChatGPT and Co. He compares xLSTM to transformers, highlighting its speed and parallel word processing capabilities. The advantages and limitations of LSTM and the introduction of xLSTM as an improved version are explored. Criticism surrounding large language models and the goal of securing 300 million euros for the project are discussed. The structural differences between LSTM and xLSTM and their potential in engineering applications are also explored.
XLSTM combines the advantages of transformer and LSTM models, improving on transformer technologies and outperforming them in terms of sensitivity on small datasets.
XLSTM has potential applications in engineering topics such as process control and logistics, with the ability to store words precisely, capture semantic meaning, and provide global context, making it superior in various domains.
Deep dives
Insight 1: The development of XLSTM as an improved technology
XLSTM is presented as an improved technology that combines the advantages of transformer and LSTM models. The speaker explains that transformer technology offers fast training and the ability to process words in parallel, while LSTM excels in abstraction and extracting important characteristics but struggles with precise word storage. Through XLSTM, the speaker aims to enhance LSTM by incorporating exponential gating and vectorization techniques, resulting in a model that improves upon transformer technologies and outperforms them in terms of sensitivity when tested on small datasets.
Insight 2: Potential applications and advantages of XLSTM
The speaker highlights the potential applications of XLSTM, particularly in engineering topics such as process control and logistics. The XLSTM model is described as having the ability to store words precisely while also capturing semantic meaning and providing global context. By combining these features, XLSTM proves to be superior in various domains. Although transformer models excel in certain scenarios, the speaker asserts that XLSTM surpasses them in almost all cases and could be scaled up to handle larger datasets.
Insight 3: Funding and IP challenges for XLSTM's implementation
The speaker discusses the need for significant funding, approximately 300 million euros, to support the development and implementation of XLSTM. The goal is to compete with existing language models like GPT and eliminate their dominance in the market. While seeking funding, the speaker aims to keep the XLSTM technology within Europe and protect it from being controlled by larger companies. The question of IP rights and university involvement is raised, and the speaker expresses the desire to find a balance that allows for rapid progress without compromising the value and contributions of the research team.