The Dissenter

#1182 Dries Bostyn: How People Respond to Trolley Dilemmas

Nov 28, 2025
Dries Bostyn, a social psychologist and moral cognition expert from Ghent University, delves into the fascinating world of trolley dilemmas. He breaks down how people make moral choices, comparing utilitarian and deontological responses. Discussing a striking experiment with real electroshocks, he reveals how motivations can vary greatly. Bostyn explores principles of action and intention, the role of cognitive ability, and even the implications of personality traits on moral decisions, leaving listeners questioning their own ethical frameworks.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Trolley Dilemmas Frame Harm Versus Action

  • Trolley dilemmas pit minimizing harm against refusing to actively harm others.
  • They reveal tensions between outcome-based reasoning and rule-based avoidance of direct harm.
INSIGHT

Variants Dramatically Shift Judgments

  • Responses depend strongly on the dilemma variant; diverting a trolley often yields utilitarian choices while pushing a person yields deontological choices.
  • Small changes in scenario structure reliably shift moral judgments.
INSIGHT

Conformity Favors Socially Safe Choices

  • People conform more to deontological majorities than to utilitarian ones because deontological choices are more socially safe.
  • Moral judgments serve communicative and reputational functions, not just personal reasoning.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app