
The Lawfare Podcast Rational Security: The “Caracas Like a Hurricane” Special Venezuela Edition
Jan 8, 2026
In this discussion, Benjamin Wittes, Natalie Orpett, and Molly Roberts dive into the U.S. intervention in Venezuela, exploring its implications and legality. They analyze the rapid operation aimed at capturing Nicolás Maduro and the mixed motives behind it. The conversation touches on the unique challenges of prosecuting a head of state, the risks of U.S. actions signaling strategies to adversaries like Russia and China, and the complex legal landscape surrounding Maduro's indictment. It's a captivating exploration of national security, foreign policy, and the unpredictable nature of U.S. intervention.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Limited Strike, Unclear Strategy
- The Venezuela operation combined limited military force with political aims rather than a full-scale occupation.
- Benjamin Wittes and Scott R. Anderson argue the strategy lacks coherent long-term planning and obvious leverage.
Converging Incentives Drove The Decision
- Multiple internal actors likely pushed different motives that converged on the Maduro removal.
- Natalie Orpett suggests DOJ, defense, and political actors each had distinct incentives shaping the decision.
Audacity Without Full Commitment
- The operation was audacious in appearance but conservative in commitment and risk exposure.
- Scott R. Anderson notes it was a snatch-and-grab with preemptive strikes to reduce U.S. casualty risk.


