The Daily The Weinstein Jury Believed the Women
Feb 25, 2020
Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey, investigative reporters for The New York Times and authors of 'She Said,' share insights on Harvey Weinstein's recent conviction for felony sex crimes. They discuss the intricacies of the trial, particularly the challenges of presenting limited testimonies amidst a complex narrative of consent. The duo explores the jury's emotional journey and the significant implications of their verdict, emphasizing how this trial marks a pivotal moment for accountability in the Me Too movement and the ongoing struggle for justice for sexual assault victims.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Initial Skepticism
- Megan Twohey initially felt skeptical about the Weinstein case.
- She questioned if it was driven by public pressure rather than strong evidence.
Complicated Testimonies
- Miriam Haley and Jessica Mann's testimonies revealed complicated relationships with Weinstein.
- Haley described continued contact after the alleged assault, while Mann recounted a three-year relationship with both consensual and non-consensual sex.
Weinstein Trial Concerns
- Some legal experts worried about the Weinstein prosecution's strategy.
- They feared that trying such a complex case could cause a backlash against the #MeToo movement.
