With the election just around the corner, discussions revolve around whether Trump’s criminal case could face dismissal and the implications of using military force domestically. The possibility of a ‘red mirage’ turning into a ‘blue shift’ adds tension, alongside concerns about Elon Musk's PAC incentivizing voter registration in swing states. The hosts delve into the legality of these maneuvers and the importance of safeguarding electoral integrity, all while reminding listeners of their vital role in democracy through voting.
The podcast highlights Trump's legal challenges regarding his attempts to dismiss charges related to the January 6th insurrection, impacting his election strategy.
Concerns are raised about Trump's potential military deployment against domestic protests, emphasizing the implications of the Posse Comitatus Act and historical context.
The legality of Elon Musk's initiatives to pay for voter registration in swing states sparks debate about the ethical boundaries of enticing electoral participation.
Deep dives
Legal Motions and January 6th Case
The episode delves into former President Trump's recent legal maneuvers, particularly his motion to dismiss charges related to the January 6th insurrection on the grounds of alleged unlawful appointment of special counsel Jack Smith. Trump's attorneys argue that new legal precedents justify this late motion, specifically referencing a concurring opinion by Justice Thomas and other recent district court rulings. However, it is emphasized that Judge Chutkin is bound by existing D.C. Circuit precedents that support Smith's appointment, complicating Trump's legal strategy. This highlights the ongoing tension between the former president's legal team and the judicial system as the election approaches.
The Insurrection Act and Domestic Military Use
The discussion includes the potential implications of Trump's threats to utilize the military domestically to quell protests or unrest, calling it a significant legal concern. The Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of federal military forces in domestic law enforcement, is explored in detail, emphasizing its historical context and current relevance. Attention is drawn to Trump's past comments suggesting he would invoke the Insurrection Act to bypass these restrictions, raising alarm about the abuse of authority. Notably, the dialogue reflects on historical instances of military deployment concerning civil rights, comparing them to current political rhetoric.
Red Mirage and Election Counting
The concept of the 'red mirage' is revisited, referencing the perception of early election results favoring Republicans due to the timing of mail-in ballots being counted. The hosts explain how this phenomenon could resurface in the upcoming elections, given changes in voting patterns and the quickened call for results. As Trump and his allies previously encouraged stopping the count of votes, there is concern regarding potential legal repercussions surrounding these actions this election cycle. The potential for unlawful behavior is underscored, reiterating the importance of protecting the voting process.
Elon Musk's Controversial Voting Incentives
The episode critically examines Elon Musk's initiatives to incentivize voter registration in swing states by offering cash payments and lotteries for participants. This move raises legal questions under federal law, specifically regarding the prohibition against paying individuals for registering to vote. Legal experts express skepticism about the legitimacy of Musk's claims that his actions are merely about supporting free speech without attempting to induce voting behavior. Recent actions by the Pennsylvania District Attorney to challenge these incentives hint at the ongoing legal scrutiny surrounding this controversial initiative.
Ongoing Legal Challenges and Voting Safeguards
The conversation emphasizes the vigilant efforts of multiple legal entities, including the Department of Justice, to maintain electoral integrity amidst rising concerns about voter suppression and manipulation. The enforcement of existing laws against obstructing the electoral process is affirmed, reflecting on the historical context of the DOJ's role during previous election cycles. Despite rising challenges, the dedication to ensuring a fair and secure voting environment is highlighted as critical for democratic participation. The hosts encourage listeners to remain vigilant and engaged in the democratic process as elections approach.
With eight days to go until Election Day, veteran prosecutors Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann tackle several issues related to the vote and its aftermath: if Donald Trump doesn’t win the election, could his DC criminal case be dismissed based on the Appointments Clause? Can a president use the military domestically against "the enemy within" despite the constraints of the Posse Comitatus Act? Will another ‘red mirage’ followed by a ‘blue shift’ cause the former president to cry foul and call for stopping the electoral count? And, will Elon Musk and his America PAC be held liable for paying residents in swing states to register? Andrew and Mary address these questions and remind listeners to vote!
Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you’ll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
