Is Money Really the Best Measure of Value? With Mohammad Akbarpour
Apr 3, 2024
auto_awesome
Stanford economics professor Mohammad Akbarpour challenges the conventional view that money is an objective measure of value. He argues that people value money differently based on their circumstances. By considering money's subjectivity, we can design more equitable markets that maximize value and welfare for more people.
People value money differently based on personal circumstances and financial status.
Market distortions can be justified to achieve better outcomes and fairness in economic markets.
Deep dives
Uber Driver's Perspective on Flexibility and Safety
Uber driver Aziz from Chicago values the control and choice working for Uber provides him, allowing him to decide when and where to drive and which rides to accept. With over 20,000 Uber trips, he appreciates the safety and flexibility compared to traditional taxi services, highlighting how incentives like surge pricing impact his earnings and choices.
Economic Insights on Market Mechanisms and Inequality
Economist Mohammed Akbarpour discusses the impact of different individuals placing varying values on money in economic markets. By challenging the traditional assumption of equal value for money, he explores how this affects market efficiency and fairness, proposing scenarios where non-market mechanisms like rationing could lead to better outcomes.
Addressing Inequities in Market Pricing and Allocation
Akbarpour explores implications of wealth disparities in market interactions like concert ticket sales and ride-sharing pricing. He suggests policies such as adjusting prices based on customers' price sensitivity or detachment of driver-passenger pricing to address inequities, highlighting the importance of considering different values for money in market design for societal welfare.
A dollar is a dollar, right? While most conventional economic theories view money as an objective store of value, Mohammad Akbarpour says this misses a subtle but important fact: different people value money differently.
Many economists assume that the price someone is willing to pay for a good or service is equivalent to the utility they get from it. But Akbarpour, an associate professor of economics at Stanford Graduate School of Business, isn’t convinced. “Different people have different marginal value for money,” he says. “If someone is willing to pay $1,000 for a Taylor Swift concert, they do not necessarily get more value [than] someone willing to pay $500. If you're willing to pay more for something, that does not mean that the social welfare is maximized for giving the good to you. It could be that you're rich.”
As Akbarpour explores on this episode of If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society, money doesn’t have to be the sole decider of how scarce resources are allocated. By considering money’s subjectivity, we can design more equitable markets that maximize value and welfare for more people.
Key Takeaways:
People value money differently: People have different subjective valuations of money based on their own circumstances and financial well-being. $100 means something much different to the CEO of a large, successful corporation than it does to a family on the brink of eviction.
Market distortions can be warranted: For some goods and services, price controls or subsidies can be more efficient than a free market at allocating resources and benefiting those with less wealth.
Real-world application: From ridesharing to concert tickets, Akbarpour shares how theoretical economics can be applied to address inequality and improve society.