Emile Hokayem, a Middle East expert from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, joins Andrew England to dissect the region's escalating tensions. They delve into the implications of recent Israeli assassinations of Hamas leaders and the looming threats of Iranian retaliation. The discussion highlights the precarious balance between military strategies and the potential for broader conflict. Hokayem emphasizes the preference of Iran and Hezbollah for smaller engagements to avoid all-out war while navigating complex diplomatic relationships in a volatile landscape.
Israel's recent assassinations are both tactical and political moves aimed at restoring deterrence credibility amid escalating tensions with Iran and Hezbollah.
The complex dynamics of the Middle East conflict highlight the urgent need for a viable political solution to prevent a cycle of violence and achieve lasting peace.
Deep dives
Escalation and Regional Tensions
The recent assassination of key Hamas and Hezbollah leaders by Israel has heightened tensions in the Middle East, with Iran and its allies poised for a retaliatory response. This marks a pivotal moment in the region, where the potential for widespread conflict looms, particularly after the violent October 7 attack by Hamas on Israel. Both Israel and Iran appear to be engaged in a dangerous game of escalation, where neither side desires an all-out war but is willing to risk it in order to maintain credibility and deterrence. Observers note that while Israel has strategically positioned itself advantageously, Iran and its allies are increasingly pressured to respond in a manner that preserves their own standing despite significant risks involved.
The Role of Deterrence and Credibility
Israel's recent military actions appear to be an effort to restore its deterrence credibility in the region following the trauma of recent attacks. The strategy seems to be driven by Prime Minister Netanyahu's need to demonstrate military strength, counteracting any perception of weakness. Assassinations of high-profile leaders are intended not only as tactical moves but also as political signals that Israel is unwilling to back down despite international scrutiny or pressure. This reassertion of deterrence has complicated diplomatic efforts aimed at securing ceasefire agreements and addressing the release of hostages, further entrenching a cycle of violence.
Challenges to a Sustainable Peace
Long-term peace in the region remains elusive, with entrenched positions on both sides complicating any potential resolution. Many analysts argue that as long as there is no clear path to a viable Palestinian state, the cycle of violence will continue to reinforce extremist narratives and actions. The devastating humanitarian conditions in Gaza have led to speculation that demographic shifts may occur as Palestinians increasingly find their living conditions untenable, potentially altering the dynamics of the conflict. Without a comprehensive political solution addressing both Israeli security concerns and Palestinian statehood aspirations, any short-term ceasefire is unlikely to lead to lasting stability.
Two assassinations carried out by Israel, one in Beirut and one in Tehran, have brought threats of retaliation from Iran and the Lebanese militant group Hizbollah. Andrew England, the FT’s Middle East editor, discusses whether the latest escalation can be contained with Emile Hokayem, a Middle East expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. Clips: AP; CBS
To take part in the audience survey mentioned by Andrew, and to be in with the chance to win a pair of Bose QuietComfort 35 Wireless Headphones, click here. Click here to find T&Cs for the prize draw.
