We the People The Future of TikTok
Jan 9, 2025
Jameel Jaffer, Executive Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, and Zephyr Teachout, a law professor at Fordham, engage in a riveting discussion about the Supreme Court's case TikTok v. Garland. They debate whether a potential ban infringes upon First Amendment rights, exploring comparisons to historical cases. The conversation emphasizes the delicate balance between national security and freedom of expression, arguing against censorship while addressing concerns about foreign influence. Their insights call for transparency and careful scrutiny in regulating digital platforms.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
TikTok Ban Compared to Historical Restrictions
- The law forcing TikTok's sale or ban is a digital-age equivalent to a 1965 law requiring registration to receive communist propaganda.
- Restricting access to information, like in repressive regimes, raises First Amendment concerns.
Sovereignty and Communication Infrastructure
- Regulating foreign ownership of communication infrastructure is crucial for national sovereignty and self-governance.
- This aligns with the U.S.'s history of protecting its democracy from foreign interference.
First Amendment and Self-Governance
- The First Amendment empowers individuals to choose their information sources for self-governance.
- Government manipulation of discourse by restricting access to platforms undermines this principle.