The podcast discusses the misuse of psychology terms, explores the impact of Kitty Genovese's murder, and debunks the ideas of bystander apathy and hardwired behavior. It also emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between genuine scientific research and misleading ideas.
Read more
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Bystander apathy can be misleading, as it originated from inaccurate reporting of the Kitty Genovese murder case in 1964.
The concept of behaviors being hardwired in the brain is a misconception, as recent neuroscience research reveals brain flexibility and the potential for change.
Deep dives
Misconceptions about Bystander Apathy
Bystander apathy is often misunderstood and misinterpreted as a psychological phenomenon. It refers to the phenomenon where people freeze and fail to act in emergencies. However, the term itself can be misleading. The concept of bystander apathy originated from the inaccurate reporting of the Kitty Genovese murder case in 1964. The original story claimed that 38 witnesses watched the murder without intervening, but subsequent investigations found many inaccuracies in the initial reporting. While there are instances of people not intervening in emergencies, it is crucial to remember that most individuals possess a capacity for emotional empathy and are willing to help others.
The Fallacy of Hardwired Behavior
The notion of behaviors being hardwired in the brain is a common but misunderstood concept. Many mistakenly believe that certain behaviors are genetically determined and unchangeable. However, recent neuroscience research has challenged this idea, revealing that most psychological attributes are not strictly hardwired and are influenced by various factors. Brain flexibility and plasticity allow individuals to change behaviors, such as overcoming addiction or controlling body movements after a stroke. While certain predispositions may exist, they do not dictate immutable behavior patterns.
Personality Type versus Personality Dimension
The classification of individuals into personality types is another commonly misused concept. People tend to believe in fixed, dichotomous personality types, such as introverts versus extroverts. However, research indicates that personality traits are continuous and multidimensional. Personality dimensions, like agreeableness or conscientiousness, exist as spectrums rather than discrete categories. Acknowledging the complexity and variability of personality traits helps avoid misinterpretations and generalizations about individuals.
The Misleading Nature of Steep Learning Curves
The concept of a steep learning curve is often misunderstood and misused. Many believe that a steep learning curve indicates a difficult or challenging learning process. However, the opposite is true. A steep learning curve actually refers to a rapid acquisition of knowledge or skills. It implies that individuals are able to learn quickly and progress efficiently. Understanding the correct meaning of this term can help avoid confusion and misrepresentation of learning experiences.
We all like to throw around terms that describe human behavior — “bystander apathy” and “steep learning curve” and “hard-wired.” Most of the time, they don’t actually mean what we think they mean. But don’t worry — the experts are getting it wrong, too.
SOURCES:
Sharon Begley, senior science writer for Stat at The Boston Globe.
Jerome Kagan, emeritus professor of psychology at Harvard University.
Bibb Latané, social psychologist and senior fellow at the Center for Human Science.