The Tom Woods Show
Ep. 2584 The Duke Lacrosse Scandal: Alleged Victim Admits She Lied
Dec 20, 2024
William L. Anderson, a professor emeritus of economics and senior editor at the Mises Institute, discusses the groundbreaking admission by Crystal Mangum, who has finally confessed that she lied about being sexually assaulted by Duke lacrosse players. The conversation revisits the case's political motivations and highlights the profound consequences of public pressure on prosecution. Anderson critiques media involvement and the dangers of prioritizing sentiment over facts, while reflecting on the lasting impact this scandal has had on the lives of the accused and society at large.
48:15
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Crystal Mangum's recent admission of lying about the Duke lacrosse incident underscores the profound implications for due process and media integrity.
- The scandal highlights systemic issues of prosecutorial misconduct and the dangerous influence of sensationalist media in shaping public opinion and justice.
Deep dives
The Duke Lacrosse Case Overview
Three Duke lacrosse players were accused of raping and beating a stripper named Crystal Mangum during a team party in March 2006. Mangum's allegations mobilized a media frenzy, notably from the New York Times, and led to an aggressive investigation by the local prosecutor, Mike Nifong. Initially, the players were indicted despite a lack of evidence, including DNA linking them to the crime, and various inconsistencies in Mangum's story. Ultimately, after extensive media coverage and public outcry, the North Carolina Attorney General declared the players innocent, highlighting the case's profound implications regarding due process and media portrayal.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
