

The Disjointed Joint Status Report
Sep 3, 2024
The podcast dives into the contentious legal battle surrounding Donald Trump, highlighting friction between his team and Special Counsel Jack Smith. The hosts unpack Trump's failed attempt to move a hush money case to federal court and the implications of recent immunity rulings. They also touch on the ethical responsibilities of legal representatives and the strategic aspects of timing in legal proceedings. Expect a mix of humor and deep analysis as they explore the evolving narrative of this high-profile saga.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Disjointed Status Report
- The Joint Status Report filed in the D.C. election interference case reveals a disagreement between Jack Smith and Trump's legal team.
- They disagree on how to proceed after the immunity decision, creating a "disjointed" report.
Unconstitutional Appointment Argument
- Trump's team wants to argue Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional.
- This mirrors their previous argument before Judge Cannon, despite other courts upholding the appointment’s validity.
Jack Smith's Proposal
- Jack Smith wants to file a brief explaining why the immunity decision doesn't apply to the superseding indictment charges.
- He also wants to address unpleaded evidence to be used at trial, proactively litigating its admissibility.