Episode 45: Billionaires, Influencers, and Ed Tech (feat. Adrienne Williams), November 18 2024
Nov 26, 2024
auto_awesome
Adrienne Williams, a former educator and DAIR research fellow, dives into the detrimental impact of tech-savvy billionaires on education. She critiques their focus on AI solutions while ignoring systemic issues in underfunded schools. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by educators of color, the ethical dilemmas of data sharing, and the startling realities of biased AI technologies. From the absurdities of self-driving wheelchairs to the dangers of AI-driven narratives, Adrienne encourages a critical look at tech’s role in our classrooms.
Billionaires like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg promote AI in education without understanding the complexities of underfunded schools and educator needs.
The promise of AI tutors ignores the emotional and social aspects of learning, risking exacerbation of existing educational disparities.
Concerns about student data privacy highlight potential surveillance issues, particularly for marginalized communities, amid the implementation of educational AI tools.
Deep dives
Critique of Philanthropic AI in Education
Philanthropists and tech leaders promote AI as a solution for educational challenges without proper expertise and context. Individuals like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates are highlighted for their attempts to address education as a technical problem, while ignoring the underlying issues of underfunded schools and lack of educator input. The illusion of comprehensive AI tutors and personalized learning tools is criticized, with suggestions that these initiatives, often framed as empowering educators, may actually exploit them. The conversation underscores the importance of genuine collaboration with educators rather than token consultations that ultimately favor corporate interests.
The Limitations of AI in Personalized Learning
AI tools, such as Khan Academy's AI tutor 'Khan Migo,' promise to provide one-on-one tutoring but fail to recognize the emotional and social aspects crucial to effective learning. Teachers stress that educational success often relies more on emotional well-being and personal connections in the classroom than on technology-driven personalization. The podcast highlights the potentially damaging consequences of overlooking these personal connections, as AI systems cannot address individual student needs or contextualize their personal struggles. Ultimately, the reliance on AI tutors may exacerbate existing disparities rather than provide the touted benefits.
Concerns Over Data Privacy and Surveillance
The implementation of AI in educational settings raises significant privacy concerns, particularly regarding how student data is collected and used. Tools like Khan Migo not only monitor student interactions but also notify adults of any inappropriate content, potentially leading to overreach and unwarranted scrutiny of students' lives. Anecdotes reveal instances where innocent inquiries by students have resulted in harmful interventions, including police involvement. This situation amplifies the fear that educational technology serves as a mechanism for surveillance, particularly for marginalized communities.
The Disconnect Between Tech and Real Educational Needs
There's a fundamental disconnect between the visions of tech leaders and the realities faced by educators and students in underfunded schools. Gates and other tech moguls fail to account for the complexities of teaching and learning environments, instead promoting simplistic technological solutions. Discussions point out that when students face numerous life challenges, effective learning often hinges on supportive teacher-student relationships rather than the introduction of AI tools. Critics warn that the continuing focus on technology diverts attention and resources from more pressing issues in education, such as class sizes and related support systems.
Historical Failures of Corporate Education Models
The podcast critiques the legacy of previous corporate-backed educational reforms, particularly initiatives from Bill Gates that have historically failed to improve educational outcomes. Despite years of investment, many of these programs ignore crucial aspects of student well-being and the real-life challenges presented by poverty and inequity. The notion that educational improvement can stem solely from technological advancement without consideration of socio-economic factors is deemed insufficient and misguided. This historical reference reinforces the call for a reevaluation of how tech influences educational policies, demanding evidence-based practices instead of speculative promises.
From Bill Gates to Mark Zuckerberg, billionaires with no education expertise keep using their big names and big dollars to hype LLMs for classrooms. Promising ‘comprehensive AI tutors', or just ‘educator-informed’ tools to address understaffed classrooms, this hype is just another round of Silicon Valley pointing to real problems -- under-supported school systems -- but then directing attention and resources to their favorite toys. Former educator and DAIR research fellow Adrienne Williams joins to explain the problems this tech-solutionist redirection fails to solve, and the new ones it creates.
Adrienne Williams started organizing in 2018 while working as a junior high teacher for a tech owned charter school. She expanded her organizing in 2020 after her work as an Amazon delivery driver, where many of the same issues she saw in charter schools were also in evidence. Adrienne is a Public Voices Fellow on Technology in the Public Interest with The OpEd Project in partnership with the MacArthur Foundation, as well as a Research Fellow at both (DAIR) and Just Tech.