Jelani Cobb, a historian and dean at Columbia's Graduate School of Journalism, joins to critique the Trump administration's portrayal of diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) as a scapegoat for societal issues. Cobb discusses how D.E.I. is manipulated as a political tool, linking it to everything from academic concerns to media narratives. He draws parallels to historical boogeymen like the Red Scare, emphasizing the malleability of D.E.I. rhetoric and its implications for marginalized communities in today’s political climate.
The Trump administration has weaponized D.E.I. policies, branding them as discriminatory while suggesting they contribute to national tragedies such as plane crashes.
Academics face heightened anxiety due to potential repercussions on funding and tenure linked to research on race and social issues amidst political scrutiny.
Deep dives
The Trump Administration's Assault on DEI
The Trump administration has initiated significant actions against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, branding them as forms of discrimination. These programs, which are designed to create more inclusive environments, are being portrayed as detrimental to societal progress. The government has even suggested that tragedies, such as a recent plane crash, may be linked to DEI policies, thereby intensifying scrutiny and fear surrounding these initiatives. This rhetoric has created a charged atmosphere in academia and other sectors, where funding and support for work related to diversity and sensitive topics are threatened.
Impact on Academia and Journalistic Integrity
The academic community is facing increasing anxiety over potential repercussions tied to research on race, gender, and social issues due to the current political climate. Concerns include funding cuts and difficulty in securing tenure, especially for junior faculty whose work may be viewed unfavorably by the administration. Academic networks echo sentiments from the McCarthy era, wherein scholars feared ostracism and professional jeopardy for engaging in controversial topics. Additionally, the media's response to these developments is under scrutiny, as journalists grapple with their role amidst a pervasive sense of disillusionment.
Public Perception and Political Strategy
Donald Trump's strategy has effectively capitalized on societal insecurities, particularly by framing DEI as a threat that undermines a supposed meritocracy. This narrative resonates with segments of the population who feel marginalized or threatened by changes in demographic and social norms. Despite significant historical progress toward inclusion, the messaging around DEI has stirred racial resentment and positioned it as a political punching bag. As the political landscape evolves, there remains a question of whether this approach can sustain itself amid complex societal challenges and fluctuating voter sentiments.
Many of the most draconian measures implemented in the first couple weeks of the new Trump Administration have been justified as emergency actions to root out D.E.I.—diversity, equity, and inclusion—including the freeze (currently rescinded) of trillions of dollars in federal grants. The tragic plane crash in Washington, the President baselessly suggested, might also be the result of D.E.I. Typically, D.E.I. describes policies at large companies or institutions to encourage more diverse workplaces. In the Administration’s rhetoric, D.E.I. is discrimination pure and simple, and the root of much of what ails the nation. “D.E.I. is the boogeyman for anything,” Jelani Cobb tells David Remnick. Cobb is a longtime staff writer, and the dean of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. “If there’s a terrible tragedy . . . if there is something going wrong in any part of your life, if there are fires happening in California, then you can bet that, somehow, another D.E.I. is there.” Although affirmative-action policies in university admissions were found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, D.E.I. describes a broad array of actions without a specific definition. “It’s that malleability,” Cobb reflects, that makes D.E.I. a useful target, “one source that you can use to blame every single failing or shortcoming or difficulty in life on.”