Critics at Large writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz dive into the trending 'slowness culture,' discussing the benefits and drawbacks of slowing down in a fast-paced world. They explore reclaiming time, work-life balance, and societal implications, questioning the accessibility and impact of leisure in a collective context.
Embracing slowness culture offers a path to better living in a fast-paced world.
Slowing down can lead to individual well-being and offer moments of contemplation in a time-pressured society.
Deep dives
Exploring Slowness Culture in Self-Improvement
The podcast delves into the concept of slowness culture, emphasizing the recent popularity of deliberately slowing down in an overly fast-paced world. It discusses how self-improvement now promotes taking it slow, highlighting the paradoxical nature of working hard but also embracing a slower pace. The episode explores the idea that deliberate slowness can lead to betterment individually and culturally.
Crisis Around Time and Impact of Slowness Culture
The discussion touches on a potential crisis around time within society, pondering if slowing down could be a solution. It reflects on how capitalism and globalization have intensified the competition, creating pressure and anxiety around time management. The episode suggests that engaging in slowness culture can help combat the societal crisis around time, offering moments of contemplation and respite.
Historical Context of Labor Movement and Slowness
Referencing the labor movement, the podcast highlights the origins of the eight-hour workday and the value of leisure time. It connects the current push for slowness culture with past efforts to ensure workers' rights to leisure. The episode explores the potential benefits of slowing down, not just for individual well-being but also as a collective movement towards valuing leisure and relaxation.
Challenges and Paradoxes in Embracing Slowness
While promoting the benefits of slowing down, the podcast acknowledges the challenges and paradoxes associated with embracing slowness culture. It discusses the privilege often linked to having the time to slow down and engage with leisure activities. The episode points out the disconnect between advocating for slowness and the societal realities that hinder widespread adoption of a slower pace of life.
In recent years, in the realms of self-improvement literature, Instagram influencers, and wellness gurus, an idea has taken hold: that in a non-stop world, the act of slowing down offers a path to better living. In this episode of Critics at Large, the staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz trace the rise of “slowness culture”—from Carl Honoré’s 2004 manifesto to pandemic-era trends of mass resignations and so-called quiet quitting. The hosts discuss the work of Jenny Odell, whose books “How to Do Nothing” and “Saving Time” frame reclaiming one’s time as a life-style choice with radical roots and revolutionary political potential. But how much does an individual’s commitment to leisure pay off on the level of the collective? Is too much being laid at the feet of slowness? “For me, it’s about reclaiming an aspect of humanness, just the experience of not having to make the most with everything we have all the time,” Schwartz says. “There can be a degree of self-defeating critique where you say, ‘Oh, well, this is only accessible to the privileged few.’ And I think the better framing is, how can more people access that kind of sitting with humanness?”