The Daily What Hangs in the Balance of Trump's Meeting With Putin
504 snips
Aug 15, 2025 
David E. Sanger, the White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, delves into the high-stakes meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin. He highlights the strategic advantages for Putin, regardless of the outcome. The discussion covers the absence of Ukrainian representatives, raising skepticism about concessions made during negotiations. Sanger addresses the implications for NATO and the need for continued Western support in light of ongoing geopolitical tensions surrounding the war in Ukraine.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Summit Could Reshape The Conflict
- The Alaska summit is the first face-to-face chance for U.S. and Russian presidents to discuss ending the Ukraine war.
- That meeting could range from nothing to a moment that reshapes European borders and influence.
Ukraine Excluded From Negotiations
- Holding talks without Ukraine in the room is a major diplomatic oddity and weakens legitimacy.
- Trump calculated a direct summit might avoid shouting matches but risks sidelining Ukraine's interests.
Trump's Erratic Approach To Putin
- Trump promised to end the war quickly based on his rapport with Putin and initially made concessions to signal goodwill.
- After gaining little in return, he turned hostile, then suddenly arranged the face-to-face meeting.