Lars Doucet and Greg Miller, co-founders of the Center for Land Economics, dive into innovative solutions for property taxation. They discuss how taxing land instead of buildings can encourage equitable development. The duo critiques California's Proposition 13 and its effects on housing affordability. They advocate for modern assessment practices and the use of AI in property appraisals, highlighting the potential for technology to enhance fairness. Plus, they share strategies for citizens to engage with local tax assessments and promote change.
Shifting property taxes from buildings to land could foster equitable urban development and alleviate financial burdens on property owners.
California's property tax caps, as demonstrated by Proposition 13, create disparities that exacerbate the housing crisis and strain local infrastructure.
Improving mass appraisal techniques and leveraging technology can enhance assessment accuracy, ensuring fair and consistent property taxation for all homeowners.
Deep dives
Introduction of the Center for Land Economics
The Center for Land Economics is being established to promote equitable tax policy and foster fair development by shifting taxes from buildings to land. This approach aims to create a more just taxation framework that supports urban development while relieving the burden on property owners. By partnering with local officials and nonprofit organizations, the center seeks to enhance assessment practices, ensuring that property valuations reflect true land values rather than development costs. Greg's diverse experience in policy development and the motivation behind launching this initiative emphasizes the need for systemic change in property tax assessments.
The Local Nature of Property Tax Assessments
Property taxes in the United States operate primarily at the local level without federal or often even state involvement, making the role of local assessors critical. Each local government typically determines property values through assessments, which influence tax rates applied to individual properties. Understanding how this system works is essential for residents who wish to navigate their property tax responsibilities. The dynamics of property tax assessments vary widely among jurisdictions, necessitating localized knowledge and advocacy for effective reform.
Challenges in Mass Appraisal and Valuation
Mass appraisal techniques face inherent challenges as they balance accuracy against consistency, critically impacting fairness in property taxation. Assessors strive for equity, but variations in housing value can lead to unequal tax burdens among similar properties. A focus on inconsistent valuations often leads to public discontent and protests, as property owners compare their assessments with neighboring homes. Addressing the tension between accurate sales assessments and maintaining a consistent market value for properties is crucial for improving public trust in the property tax system.
The Risks of Sales Chasing in Assessment
Sales chasing, or relying solely on recent sale prices for property valuations, is discouraged due to its potential inaccuracies and inequities. This method overlooks the fluctuations in market conditions and can mischaracterize properties that have different sale timelines or seasonal value shifts. Because not every property sells every year, assessors risk underestimating or overestimating the value of unsold properties, which can lead to inequitable tax assessments. Recognizing that market value is a hypothetical construct helps clarify the need for more standardized and consistent assessment methodologies.
Inequities Created by Proposition 13 and Other Tax Caps
Proposition 13 in California exemplifies how property tax caps can create inequitable situations, with some homeowners enjoying artificially low rates compared to newer buyers facing market rates. This creates a class of long-time homeowners who benefit disproportionately, challenging the fairness of the tax system. As property values rise faster than mandated tax increases, cities struggle to adapt and fund necessary services, leading to a strained infrastructure. These cap policies can exacerbate the housing crisis by encouraging speculation and limiting new development in high-demand areas.
Potential Solutions for Property Tax Reform
A shift towards land value taxation, where taxes are levied primarily on land rather than buildings, may offer a more equitable solution for funding local government needs. This approach encourages development while not penalizing property improvement, allowing for equitable growth in urban areas. Educating policymakers about the benefits of adopting a land value tax can lead to significant changes in the way property taxes are structured. Additionally, proposals for implementing technological upgrades in assessment methods could streamline processes and improve data accuracy, ultimately benefiting taxpayers.
Patrick McKenzie (patio11) is joined by Lars Doucet and Greg Miller, co-founders who have just launched the Center for Land Economics, to discuss improving property taxation in the US. They explore how shifting taxes from buildings to land could transform development patterns, why California's property tax caps coincide with its housing crisis, and how the fundamental trade-off between assessment accuracy and consistency creates winners and losers. The conversation also covers the posting-to-policy pipeline, their work developing open-source tools to improve assessment equity, and techniques citizens can use to influence their local assessment office. –
Ready to save time and close deals faster? Inbound security reviews shouldn’t slow down your team or your sales cycle. Leading companies use SafeBase to eliminate up to 98% of inbound security questionnaires, automate workflows, and accelerate pipeline. Go to safebase.io/podcast –
