The Non-Physical Nature of Being: More with Dr. Selmer Bringsjord
Apr 18, 2024
auto_awesome
Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discusses the non-physical nature of mathematical objects and formal thinking. Topics include the importance of formal thinking, the contrast between determinacy and ambiguity, understanding algorithms, the essence of triangularity, and exploring philosophical argumentation in a thought-provoking manner.
Human beings are immaterial entities connected to non-physical concepts like algorithms.
Physical representations have limitations in conveying understanding of abstract concepts like triangularity and algorithms.
Deep dives
The Unique Argument for the Immateriality of Human Persons
The argument presented in the podcast focuses on the immateriality of human persons, contrasting it with traditional arguments against physicalism. Rather than emphasizing consciousness or qualia, this argument centers on formal thinking and the non-physical nature of mathematical objects like algorithms. It delves into the relationship between logical and mathematical objects, such as algorithms, and how they are inherently non-physical. The overarching question raised is about the nature of human beings and their deep, understandable connection to these non-physical concepts.
Defining and Demonstrating the Non-Physical Nature of Mathematical Objects
The podcast explores the concept that mathematical objects, including algorithms, are non-physical entities. It discusses the determinacy of meaning in formal thinking and contrasts it with the inherent ambiguity of physical representations. Using examples like algorithms, the argument demonstrates the challenges of purely physical embodiments in conveying understanding. The focus is on the necessary relationship between users and these formal concepts, highlighting the limitations of physical interpretations in capturing the essence of non-physical objects.
Grasping the Immateriality Through Examples Like Triangularity
By delving into examples like triangularity, the podcast expands on the challenges of physical embodiments in representing abstract concepts. It emphasizes the inexactness and inherent ambiguity of physical representations, contrasting it with the determinacy of meaning in formal thinking. Through discussions on understanding concepts like triangularity and algorithms, the argument highlights the limitations of physical manifestations in capturing the essence of immaterial objects. The podcast underscores the significance and philosophical depth of the argument in challenging traditional physicalist views.
On this episode, host Pat Flynn continues his conversation with Dr. Selmer Bringsjord about his chapter in the recent volume Minding the Brain, titled “Mathematical Objects Are Non-Physical, so We Are Too.” The discussion focuses on the first part of the argument, which asserts that mathematical objects are non-physical. Bringsjord explains that formal thinking, such as understanding algorithms, cannot be fully determined Read More ›