Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy The Trial: Zero Witnesses for the Defense
Jun 24, 2025
The podcast dives into the intricate details surrounding Sean Combs' trial, spotlighting both prosecution evidence and defense tactics. It tackles the complex challenges of protecting anonymous witnesses, balancing confidentiality with the need for judicial transparency. The discussion also highlights the ethical responsibilities of media in covering witness anonymity. Additionally, it uncovers the credibility struggles faced by potential witnesses in high-stakes trials, providing a thought-provoking look into the legal system.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Defense Calls Zero Witnesses
- The defense in Sean Combs's trial surprisingly decided not to call any witnesses, including Diddy himself.
- This strategy likely aims to challenge the prosecution after their detailed evidence presentation.
Many Lawyers, Specializations Matter
- The number of attorneys a defendant can have depends on courtroom space and budget.
- Using attorneys with specialized skills creates a well-rounded defense team like different players on a basketball team.
Paying Witness’s Costs Legally Complex
- Paying for a witness's attorney and rent raises ethical concerns but is legally possible with the witness's consent.
- Continuing to pay for a witness's rent can look less suspicious than abruptly stopping payments during a trafficking investigation.
