#308: More Evidence that Benedict XVI is Pope —Matthew Hanley

Support our work: https://www.patrickcoffin.media/donate

Support us by joining the Coffin Nation Community: www.coffinnation.com

FOLLOW ME

Telegram: https://t.me/patrickcoffinmedia Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/realpatrickcoffin/ Gab: https://gab.com/PatrickCoffin

SPONSORS

👉Z Stack protocol for early Covid treatment and prevention. Get yours here: www.zstacklife.com/CoffinNation

👉My Pillow: Support true patriot Mike Lindell by getting some of his incredible US-made products here: https://www.mypillow.com/patrick

____________________________________________________

The evidence that the true Pontiff of the Catholic Church is His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI is clear and straightforward according to Matthew Hanley. The award-winning Catholic ethicist joins me this week to talk about how he came to discover the evidence that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is our latest anti-pope (after several centuries), and why this conclusion can no longer be called fringe or rad trad in nature. After this interview, you will know:

• The step-by-step journey taken by Hanley toward the full clarity of the evidence 
• The difference between the canonical crimes of the St. Gallen Mafia in the March 2013 Conclave and the Declaratio read by His Holiness on February 11, 2013
• The difference between munus and ministerium and why it matters
• Which key word is missing from Benedict’s “abdication” 
• Why the evidence and its conclusion have nothing to do with sedevacantism
• The real meaning of antipope
• Clues that the Pope knows he created an Impeded See and is therefore the true office holder of the papacy
• What ordinary Catholics should and can do in light of this evidence

Resources Mentioned

• Francis: The First Anti-Pope in Centuries? In Front Page magazine by Matthew Hanley
• The Ratzinger Code by Andrea Cionci
• Two-part interview with Estefanía Acosta on the canonical aspects of the Benedict Is Pope evidence and conclusion
• Five-part refutation of the so-called Substantial Error theory by Acosta: One, Two, Three, Four, Five