Opening Arguments

OA541: Monica Miller on Happy the Elephant and Legal Personhood for Animals

Nov 9, 2021
Ask episode
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1
Introduction
00:00 • 5min
2
The Hippos Are the Most Dangerous Local Animal, Not the Person
05:20 • 6min
3
Is That a Hard Case?
10:51 • 4min
4
Hungry Jack's in Australia?
15:06 • 2min
5
Why I Love My X Chair
17:15 • 2min
6
Ora Provides Complete Digital Security Protection
19:10 • 3min
7
Is Happy the Elephant a Person for the Purposes of the Common Law Right to Be Free?
21:44 • 3min
8
Is It a Fair Characterpisition?
24:18 • 2min
9
Non Human Rights Project: Ono Kan Should Win
26:43 • 3min
10
Are We Not Going to Free All of the Dogs in the State of New York?
29:28 • 4min
11
Elephants Pass the Mirror Test
33:12 • 2min
12
Humans Can't Pass That Self Recognition Test
35:31 • 2min
13
The Stock Piling Poo
37:37 • 2min
14
Petrus Trusts in New York
39:27 • 2min
15
Animals, as Pets, Are the Beneficiaries
41:51 • 5min
16
We Want the Right to Bodily Liberty for Animals
47:03 • 2min
17
Columbia Law - Hippo Cases, Clams
48:58 • 2min
18
Are We Going to Have an Amarchist Brief in the New Year?
51:00 • 2min
19
The New York Court of Appeal
52:36 • 3min
20
Is There a Correlation Between Animals and Personhood?
55:23 • 2min
21
Are You a Kangaroo Court, I'm Oftimistic?
56:54 • 2min
22
Is There a Difference Between a Human and an Elephant?
58:48 • 2min
23
Elephant Rights vs Welfare
01:00:23 • 2min
24
Slash Law - Episodes 1 and 2
01:02:18 • 6min
25
Can You Write a Statement Against Interest?
01:08:17 • 5min
26
How to Abuse the Hearsay
01:12:49 • 4min
27
This Is the Podcast of Opening Arguments
01:16:39 • 2min