Investigative reporter Jodi Kantor discusses the overturning of Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes conviction, impacting the #MeToo movement. The fragility of the prosecution's case, intense legal debate on prosecuting sexual crimes, and the aftermath of Weinstein's overturned conviction are explored in detail.
The overturning of Harvey Weinstein's conviction challenges the legal system's approach to prosecuting sexual crimes.
The decision reflects a broader debate on evidence rules and accountability in addressing workplace abuses.
Deep dives
Overturning of Harvey Weinstein's Conviction
New York's highest court overturned Harvey Weinstein's conviction for sex crimes and ordered a new trial, erasing his landmark sentence that was celebrated as a significant moment for the Me Too movement. Despite being convicted in 2020 and sentenced to 23 years in jail, the prosecution's case was always controversial and focused on the testimonies of only two out of nearly 100 women who accused Weinstein of abuse. The prosecutors faced challenges due to the limited number of women eligible to testify and the complex nature of the victims' stories, which included consensual interactions alongside victimization.
Legal Divisions on Conviction Overturn
The judges who overturned Weinstein's conviction were split into traditionalists and realists, reflecting differing views on the evidence presented during the trial. While the majority deemed the prosecution's inclusion of additional witnesses as overreach and not directly relevant to the central charges, the dissenters emphasized the importance of flexibility in evidence rules when prosecuting sexual crimes. This division highlighted a fundamental debate on how the legal system should handle such cases, balancing accountability and fairness in delivering justice.
Implications for Me Too Movement and Legal Progress
The overturning of Weinstein's conviction represents a symbolic blow to the Me Too movement and raises questions about accountability and progress in addressing workplace abuses. While the ruling may seem like a setback, it also signifies a moment of legal reflection and experimentation as prosecutors navigate complex cases with imperfect evidence. Despite individual case outcomes, structural changes in laws and statutes, influenced by the Me Too movement, continue to reshape the legal landscape and offer new avenues for survivors of abuse to seek justice and accountability.
When the Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes four years ago, it was celebrated as a watershed moment for the #MeToo movement. Yesterday, New York’s highest court of appeals overturned that conviction.
Jodi Kantor, one of the reporters who broke the story of the abuse allegations against Mr. Weinstein in 2017, explains what this ruling means for him and for #MeToo.
Guest: Jodi Kantor, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.
Background reading:
The verdict against Harvey Weinstein was overturned by the New York Court of Appeals.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode