The Lawfare Podcast

Lawfare Daily: The Supreme Court Takes the Bait: Loper Bright and the Future of Chevron Deference

Jul 12, 2024

Law professors Bridget Dooling and Nick Bednar discuss the recent Supreme Court decision overturning the Chevron doctrine, exploring the implications for administrative law. They delve into the Loper Bright case, agency interpretations, deference standards, and the broader impact on separation of powers. The podcast also touches on online privacy protection with Delete Me and analyzes the Corner Post decision's effects on administrative law and presidential authority.

51:39

Creator website

Episode guests

Bridget Dooling

Nick Bednar

AI Summary

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

The Supreme Court's recent decisions show skepticism towards administrative agencies, emphasizing a need to limit agency power.

Loper -Bright overturning the Chevron deference doctrine shifts focus on deference to agency interpretations, impacting challenges to agency rules.

Deep dives

The Supreme Court's Impact on Administrative Law

The Supreme Court's recent decisions show a skepticism towards administrative agencies while also empowering the presidency. Key cases like Loper -Bright and Corner Post highlight how the Court aims to limit agency power while increasing presidential authority. This tension reflects a broader debate on the role of the administrative state and the separation of powers.

Intro

2min

Overturning Chevron Deference in Loper-Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

23min

The Supreme Court Case of Loper Bright and the Future of Chevron Deference

1min

Protecting Online Privacy with Delete Me

6min

Implications of Loperbright and Skidmore Deference Standards

16min

Implications of Corner Post Decision on Administrative Law

8min

Analyzing the tension between the administrative state, presidency, and Congress

4min

Alan Rozenshtein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School and Senior Editor at Lawfare, and Molly Reynolds, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Senior Editor at Lawfare, spoke with Bridget Dooling, Assistant Professor of Law at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Nick Bednar, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School, about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overruled the decades-long Chevron doctrine that required courts to defer to reasonable interpretations of their statutes.

To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/c/trumptrials.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.