Outrage + Optimism: The Climate Podcast
200. Lifelines VS Deadlines: The Need For Science Based Policy (Part One)
Episode guests
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Government policy is essential for achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and requires alignment with private sector commitments.
- Fossil fuel industry obstructs climate action through lobbying and denialism, influencing government policies negatively.
- Investors can drive decarbonization by supporting regulatory frameworks, ESG factors, and accountability measures to combat climate risks and greenwashing.
Deep dives
Importance of Science-Based Policy for Achieving Net Zero by 2050
Government policy plays a crucial role in driving the transition to net zero emissions by 2050. Without supportive science-based policies, meeting the target will be challenging. Examples like the carbon tax in Singapore show how regulatory interventions can facilitate decarbonization efforts. The alignment of private sector commitments with government policies is essential for effective climate action.
Corporate Influence on Climate Politics and Delay Tactics
The fossil fuel industry has been involved in organized efforts to undermine climate science and delay policy actions to protect their interests. Through lobbying, dark money tactics, and front groups, they obstruct meaningful climate legislation. Corporate influence, particularly in the US, has corrupted the political system, preventing bipartisan climate initiatives and perpetuating climate denialism.
The Role of Investors in Driving Climate-Friendly Policies
Investors, especially large companies, can support government action by aligning their strategies with net zero goals and advocating for regulatory frameworks that drive decarbonization. The focus on ESG (environmental, social, and governance) factors is crucial for sustainable investment practices. Standardization of disclosures and transparency in reporting can enhance accountability and combat greenwashing practices.
The Economic Impact of Climate Change on GDP and Employment
Failure to address climate change could have severe economic consequences, leading to significant harm to GDP, employment, and inflation. With rising risks, such as increased insurance costs, financial instability becomes a concern. The current trajectory, if maintained, could result in a global temperature increase of around three and a half degrees, far exceeding the Paris Agreement's goals. The potential physical risks at this level, including extreme weather events and geopolitical issues from mass migration, highlight the urgent need for action.
Role of Financial Institutions in Driving Policy for Net Zero Commitments
Financial institutions play a crucial role in influencing government policies to support businesses and investors in achieving net zero commitments. By engaging in debates and highlighting market failures that hinder sustainable practices, these institutions can shape the real economy discourse. Additionally, their understanding of complex financial systems positions them to shed light on needed changes and support courageous policymakers advocating for significant transformations. Through informing discussions, encouraging ethical investment, and holding governments accountable, financial institutions can drive sustainable practices and help navigate the transition to a greener economy.
Welcome to another episode of Outrage + Optimism, where we examine issues at the forefront of the climate crisis, interview change-makers, and transform our anger into productive dialogue about building a sustainable future. This week Paul Dickinson introduces the first of his two-part series on Lifelines vs Deadlines: The Need for Science Based Policy by delving into some of the big, underlying and often nefarious causes currently blocking the implementation of meaningful science-based policy which would accelerate our collective transition to a net zero world. Paul kicks off the episode by outlining the enormity of the net zero target that businesses have set themselves in line with scientific targets and expresses his belief (which is share by many) that these goals are not achievable without meaningful government policy to derisk, regulate, set a level playing field and penalise persistent offenders. Why then, instead of governments swooping in with these regulatory lifelines, are we seeing at best antipathy or at worst active disinformation campaigns to block regulation that might aid businesses to make the necessary transitions to align with Net Zero strategies and investments? What are the forces at play? Why aren't governments stepping up to the challenge? These are a few of the questions Paul and Dylan will be exploring over Part One of this mini series with a range of expert guests including:
-
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
-
Naomi Oreskes
-
Amita Chaudhury
-
Steve Waygood
-
Chris Skidmore MP
NOTES AND RESOURCES
Dylan Tanner, InfluenceMap Website | Twitter | LinkedIn Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Twitter | Instagram | Facebook Naomi Oreskes Twitter | LinkedIn Amita Chaudhury LinkedInAIA Group Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn Steve Waygood Twitter | LinkedIn Aviva Investors LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube Chris Skidmore MP Twitter Credits: Series Producer: Catherine Harte Exec Producer: Sarah Thomas Producer/Sound Design/Editor: Clay Carnill Production Coordinator: Mandy Clark Social Media Manager: Kam-Mei Chak Communications Manager: Zoe Tcholak-Antitch Operations Manager: Katie Bradford It’s official, we’re a TED Audio Collective Podcast - Proof! Check out more podcasts from The TED Audio Collective Please follow us on social media! Twitter | Instagram | LinkedIn
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
