Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Introduction
00:00 • 3min
The EPA Case: A Brief History
02:38 • 4min
Justice Scalia's Rapunos vs. EPA
06:45 • 3min
I Think the Line Drawing Is Going to Be Hard in 100 Years, 200 Years.
10:12 • 2min
The Rapunas Plurality - Is There a Third Way?
12:05 • 3min
Justice Scalia's Plurality in Rapunas
15:09 • 2min
I Think There's Some Confusion at the Argument About Adjacency in the Trump Administration's Waters Protection Rule
16:43 • 3min
Rivers and Harvers Act Section 10 Waters and Adjacent Wetland
20:07 • 2min
Is Section 404G a Donut Hole?
22:34 • 2min
EPA and the Significant Nexus Test in the Poshruli Case?
24:16 • 3min
The EPA Rule on Wetland Regulation in the United States Is Not a Question of Adjucency
27:21 • 4min
404G - The Only Textual Support for the Clean Water Act
31:32 • 2min
404 G Is a Way of Adding Some Complexion and Some Narrowing of a Term
33:42 • 2min
404 G - Is That a Vague Rule?
35:48 • 4min
The Major Questions Doctrine Is an Interesting Comparison
39:25 • 2min
EPA's Response to the County of Malley in Rapunos
40:56 • 3min
Groundwater - What Is the Waters of the United States?
43:27 • 2min
Is There a Good Answer?
45:39 • 2min
Is EPA Encouraging the SACADs?
47:59 • 4min
Is There a Prior Jurisdictional Determination?
51:47 • 3min
The Pushback Is Effective, but I Still Think That That Doesn't Help.
54:57 • 2min
The Sack
56:39 • 2min
Is It OK to Build a House on a Vacant Lot?
58:31 • 2min
SAC JD Process
01:00:20 • 2min
EPA vs Justice Kavanaugh - Is the Commerce Clause Subject to Federal Regulation Authority?
01:02:11 • 3min