Love and Attachment Styles. A conversation with Robert Rowland Smith & Mark Vernon
Oct 7, 2023
auto_awesome
In a thought-provoking discussion, Robert Rowland Smith, an expert in love and attachment styles, teams up with Mark Vernon, a philosopher exploring love's deeper meanings. They tackle intriguing questions about why we love, navigating between Freud's and Lacan's theories. The duo delves into how early experiences shape adult relationships and the interplay of love and suffering. They explore love as both idealization and a profound realization of reality, ultimately questioning the balance between individual desires and collective connections.
Attachment theory reveals that secure emotional bonds foster independence in relationships, while insecure attachments can hinder healthy engagement.
The conversation emphasizes love's complexity, linking idealization and suffering to personal growth and a deeper communal understanding of connection.
Deep dives
Exploring Attachment Theory
Attachment theory plays a crucial role in understanding relationships and love, with foundational work by John Bowlby highlighting how early emotional bonds shape future connections. Bowlby’s research indicates that secure attachment fosters independence in individuals, allowing them to explore the world while knowing they have a stable base to return to. In contrast, insecure attachment can lead to clinginess or avoidance patterns in adulthood, affecting how people engage in their relationships. Concepts such as transitional objects, introduced by Donald Winnicott, further illustrate how children process attachment and separation experiences, impacting their emotional development.
The Evolution of Love and Idealization
Discussions about love often encompass the complexities of idealization, as highlighted by Freudian theories that suggest love involves an oversimplified attachment to others, overshadowing deeper emotional needs. Love is portrayed as an idealization of the object rather than just a connection, which can lead to unhealthy dynamics in relationships if reality does not meet these elevated expectations. This idealization can manifest symbolically through the repeated emotional patterns individuals express over time, revealing underlying attachment issues. Recognizing this tendency encourages a more nuanced understanding that love must balance ideals with the realities of human connection.
Navigating Love Through Crisis
Love is tied intricately to the experience of suffering, suggesting that true love often emerges from navigating difficult personal crises and separating from idealized notions of romantic love. Such crises can challenge individuals to reconsider their expectations, ultimately leading to a richer understanding of love that is less about possession and more about connection. The process of reconciling personal feelings with shared experiences stresses the need for authenticity and growth within relationships, transcending basic attachment needs. This deeper comprehension can help individuals align their love with a reality that embraces both personal growth and the shared journey with others.
Love as a Universal Connection
In exploring love beyond personal relationships, the conversation shifts towards the idea of a shared spiritual or universal love that transcends individual experiences. This perspective suggests that the essence of love encompasses a broader communal experience where individual identities can meld, enriching the collective human experience. Love becomes a force that not only fulfills personal needs but also connects us on a deeper level, suggesting that the journey of love is as much about communal harmony as it is about personal satisfaction. Reflecting on love in this expansive way allows for a recognition of its transformative potential, urging individuals to embrace a mindset of abundance rather than scarcity in their relationships.
Why do we love? Is love inevitably a foolhardy endeavour? Or does it lead to a knowledge of reality beyond reason?
In this discussion, Robert Rowland Smith and Mark Vernon discuss the ideas of Freud and Lacan, Bowlby and Winnicott, who had differing ideas about the nature of love and where it leads.
Is love the idealisation of another, which inevitably leads to frustration and loss? Is love the realisation of a wider reality which, without it, we would neither feel drawn to or be prepared to know?
And why are love and suffering so intimately linked, so that strangely it promises our greatest fulfilment and worst fears?
For more on Robert - https://www.robertrowlandsmith.com For more on Mark - https://www.markvernon.com
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode