
The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast Episode 148, 'Divine Commands' with Paul Taylor (Part II - Further Analysis and Discussion)
Nov 2, 2025
In this enlightening discussion, Paul Taylor, a doctoral candidate at the University of Liverpool, dives into the complexities of divine command theory. He addresses whether morality relies on God’s whims or exists independently. Taylor navigates challenging topics like the impact of contradictory divine commands and the nature of moral obligation. He also shares insights on his personal stance as a moral subjectivist, emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting divine instructions. This thought-provoking conversation challenges listeners to reconsider the foundations of morality.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Omnipotence Favors A God Who Can Err
- Paul Taylor argues a truly omnipotent God could command murder but chooses not to, preserving maximal power and goodness.
- He prefers divine command theory over the 'God-bounded-by-goodness' view because the former preserves God's full omnipotence.
Handling Conflicting Divine Commands
- Taylor admits contrary divine commands pose a problem for divine command theory and suggests we might follow the latest command.
- He then tempers that by appealing to God's immutability and benevolence to avoid real contradictions.
Question Extraordinary Divine Instructions
- Taylor advises questioning whether a dream or strikingly immoral instruction genuinely comes from God before obeying.
- He recommends relying on our internal moral compass, which he views as ultimately God-derived, to judge authenticity.
