Dialogue. The Shein Model vs Zara, and Home Depot's Valuation circa 1999
whatshot 13 snips
Apr 10, 2024
The podcast covers valuation of Home Depot in 1999 and the business models of Zara and Shein. Topics include reverse DCF, margin of safety, store assumptions, growth potential, management credibility, disruptive retail models, competition, and consumer preferences.
43:46
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
High Implied Return as Margin of Safety
A high implied return in valuation mathematically equals having a margin of safety.
Focusing on expected returns and assumptions helps contextualize risk in investing decisions.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Margin of Safety Needs Timeline
Avoid thinking of margin of safety as a fixed discount; it effectively reduces expected returns.
Always associate a timeline with margin of safety to understand its real impact.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Home Depot's 1999 Store Expansion Plan
Home Depot in 1999 planned to grow from 930 to 1900 stores by 2003.
With $45M average revenue per store and 10% margins, estimated earnings were $4.6B for valuation.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Sign up for Speedwell's free newsletter and weekly memos here
*-*-*-
Follow Us:
Twitter: @Speedwell_LLC
Threads: @speedwell_research
Email us at info@speedwellresearch.com for any questions, comments, or feedback.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Disclaimer
Nothing in this podcast is investment advice nor should be construed as such. Contributors to the podcast may own securities discusessed. Furthermore, accounts contributors advise on may also have positions in companies discussed. Please see our full disclaimers here: https://speedwellresearch.com/disclaimer/