

Deep DIve Intel Briefing - What We Learned This Week /Lt COl Daniel Davis
Oct 18, 2025
This week, the discussion delves into Trump's controversial proposal to freeze the Russia-Ukraine conflict at the current battle lines. The complexities of ceasefires are examined, revealing deeper issues that remain unaddressed. Insights into Putin's strategic leverage and the implications of U.S. military support for Ukraine raise questions about neutrality in mediation. Additionally, analyses of Russia's military tactics and the potential for U.S. covert actions in Venezuela create a tense atmosphere surrounding international relations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Ceasefire At The Line Isn’t A Solution
- President Trump suggested stopping the Russia–Ukraine war at the current battle line as an immediate ceasefire without resolving root causes.
- Daniel Davis explains neither Russia, Ukraine, nor Europe are willing to accept a frozen frontline without addressing core demands.
Russia Won’t Accept A Frozen Front
- Russia demands core political guarantees and protections for ethnic Russians before any lasting ceasefire.
- Davis argues Russia won't accept a frozen line because that would be viewed at home as a catastrophic loss for Putin.
Tomahawk Promise Then Pullback
- Trump floated supplying Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, then later signaled the U.S. might keep those capabilities for itself.
- Davis shows that flip-flop left Zelensky publicly confused and weakened during his U.S. visit.