Open to Debate Mock Trial: Should Trump’s Conviction Stand?
Jul 26, 2024
Legal experts debate Trump's conviction in a mock trial, questioning presidential immunity and due process rights. They discuss the specificity of indictments, falsification of records, and the impact of Supreme Court rulings. The episode emphasizes civil discourse and challenging extreme polarization through thoughtful debate.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Due Process Concerns
- Randy Zelin argues that the verdict against Donald Trump is a product of ignoring constitutional rights.
- He claims Trump wasn't adequately informed of the charges, hindering his defense.
Appeal Unlikely
- Erwin Chemerinsky believes the appeal is unlikely to succeed, citing a low reversal rate.
- He emphasizes the overwhelming evidence and unanimous jury verdict.
Lack of Specificity
- Randy Zelin says Trump was not informed of the specific conduct elevating the charges to felonies.
- He points out that the jury had multiple options for underlying offenses.