The chapter delves into the criminal conspiracy involving Trump and American Media Inc., discussing the possible overturning of Trump's conviction and the implications of the non-prosecution agreement given to the National Enquirer for violating the Tillman Act. Guests analyze the novelty of legal arguments and charges in a specific case related to prosecution and indictment, debating the significance of these novel approaches on the law and the outcome of the case.
Donald Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, but legal scholars question whether it could be overturned in an appeal or due to a new Supreme Court ruling. Those arguing for New York say no individual, even a president, is above the law. Those arguing for the defendant say his actions were within the scope of his official duties. Now we debate: Mock Trial: Should Trump’s Conviction Stand?
For the Appellee: Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law
For the Appellant: Randy Zelin, Trial Attorney; Adjunct Law Professor at Cornell Law School
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices