Shameless Popery #285 REBUTTAL: “Why I Don’t Accept The Papacy” (MEGA EPISODE)
17 snips
Sep 15, 2026 Brayden Cook, a Catholic apologist with Catholic Answers and The Catechumen, joins Joe to examine objections to the papacy. They explore arguments from silence, Matthew 16, Peter’s role in the early Church, and whether councils limit papal authority. The discussion travels through First Clement, Ignatius, Irenaeus, Pope Victor, and the historical case for Roman primacy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Peter Represents The Whole Church
- Matthew 16 addresses Peter singularly, gives him a new name, and uses singular verbs for the keys.
- Augustine’s claim that Peter represents the whole church can support, rather than undermine, a Petrine office.
The Jerusalem Council Confirms Peter’s Direction
- Peter’s encounter with Cornelius precedes and guides the Council of Jerusalem’s confirmation of Gentile inclusion.
- A council collaborating with Peter does not disprove papal authority; councils can clarify discipline while affirming prior leadership.
The Bible Is Not An Ecclesial Blueprint
- The New Testament never provides a complete blueprint for any church polity, including succession for deacons, presbyters, or bishops.
- Because the church existed before the New Testament, later apostolic witnesses help explain its established structure.







