Jonah Bromwich, a criminal justice reporter for The New York Times, shares insights from the pivotal closing arguments in the trial of Donald Trump. He discusses the prosecution's compelling case, bolstered by impactful testimonies, and critiques the defense's strategy to question witness credibility and downplay Trump’s involvement. The podcast also sheds light on the jury dynamics in such a landmark trial, revealing the complexities faced by jurors as they navigate 34 charges against the backdrop of significant political implications.
Defense highlights case as business record falsification, distancing Trump from dubious documents.
Prosecution reinforces case with testimonies beyond Cohen, constructing coherent narrative placing Trump at center of election conspiracy cover-up.
Deep dives
Defense's Alternative Theory Presentation
During the defense's closing argument, Todd Blanche highlights three pillars in the defense's strategy. First, he emphasizes that the case is primarily about falsifying business records rather than the sensational elements. Second, he distances Trump from the dubious documents, asserting that Trump was not involved in their creation due to his official duties. Finally, the defense attacks Michael Cohen's credibility, focusing on inconsistencies in his testimony.
Prosecution's Strong Counterarguments
In response, the prosecution led by Joshua Steinglass reinforces its case by highlighting critical witnesses beyond Cohen. For instance, David Packer, former National Enquirer publisher, directly implicates Trump in the hush money scheme aimed at suppressing negative stories. Additionally, testimonies from loyal Trump aides like Hope Hicks provide further incriminating evidence against Trump's involvement in the conspiracy.
The Prosecution's Compelling Storytelling
The prosecution skillfully constructs a coherent narrative placing Trump at the center of the election conspiracy cover-up. By presenting a detailed timeline and impactful evidence, including phone records and witness testimonies, Joshua Steinglass underscores the gravity of Trump's actions in defrauding the public. This structured approach enhances the prosecution's case, emphasizing the significance of holding a former president accountable for deceiving the American people.
On Tuesday, lawyers for the prosecution and the defense delivered their final arguments to the jury in the criminal case of The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump.
Jonah Bromwich, one of the lead reporters covering the trial for The Times, was there.
Guest: Jonah E. Bromwich, who covers criminal justice in New York for The New York Times.
Watch Jonah Bromwich recap the day outside the courthouse.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode