Best of the Spectator Coffee House Shots: why is antisemitism so pervasive? Irving v Lipstadt 25 years on
May 26, 2025
Deborah Lipstadt, a renowned historian and expert on Holocaust denial, and Anthony Julius, the legal mastermind behind her defense in the iconic Irving v. Lipstadt trial, delve into the enduring impact of their landmark case 25 years later. They explore the unsettling roots of antisemitism and how it continues to thrive in today's society. The duo discusses the intersection of history and law, the importance of Holocaust remembrance, and the dangers of misinformation. Their insights highlight the pressing need for vigilance against historical denialism in our current landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Historical Significance of the Trial
- The trial amassed comprehensive evidence destroying Holocaust denial by scrutinizing deniers' footnotes.
- This was the first time top historians systematically dismantled Holocaust denial arguments in court.
Holocaust Denial as Antisemitism
- Holocaust denial stems from classic antisemitism, claiming Jews conspire to falsely accuse Germany.
- Denial survives because it fits antisemitic patterns and persists as a hatred form.
Court's Role in Historical Debate
- Legal rulings provide historical record with state-backed authority beyond academic debate.
- Court judgments influence public understanding by lending judicial endorsement to historical facts.
