Prof. Candace Vogler discusses Elizabeth Anscombe's views on justice, morality, and the importance of reflecting on moral values. They explore Anscombe's critique of traditional ethics, the impact of divine law, natural law in Catholic thought, diverse perspectives in moral philosophy, moral prohibitions, acting well, ethical analysis of refusing to sign a document, central cases in understanding concepts like rape and murder, and Anselm's role in moral discourse.
Reviving Aristotelian justice helps understand moral character.
Divine law ethics assist in comprehending moral obligations.
Critiquing existing moral theories highlights the need for absolute prohibitions.
Deep dives
Reviving Thought About Justice and Ethics
Reviving thought about justice and ethics as suggested by Elizabeth Anscombe is crucial. Anscombe advocated returning to Aristotle's ideas on justice to understand how being an unjust human affects one's moral character. The central theme emphasizes the need to theorize moral prohibition in philosophical ethics, essential for ethical deliberation and understanding moral responsibilities.
Divine Law Ethics and Moral Prohibition
Elizabeth Anscombe highlighted the significance of divine law ethics in addressing moral matters where non-theist ethics fall short. She emphasized that philosophers require the context of divine law to comprehend moral obligations and prohibitions. Anscombe's argument stressed the intrinsic badness of certain acts and the importance of moral prohibitions in guiding ethical conduct.
Challenges to Traditional Moral Philosophy
In critiquing introspective moral psychology, neo-Kantian moral theory, consequentialist moral theory, and social contract theory, Anscombe highlighted the limitations in existing moral philosophies. She emphasized the necessity of absolute prohibitions rooted in divine law ethics, contrasting with conventional approaches that neglect essential moral considerations and fail to address the special character of moral duties.
Ethical Prohibitions and Moral Agents
The podcast discusses the concept of ethical prohibitions and the behavior of ideal moral agents in various circumstances. It highlights the philosophical exploration of absolute prohibitions and the potential actions that a morally responsive agent could undertake, emphasizing the complexity of moral decision-making. The discussion delves into scenarios where individuals are challenged to act against societal norms, reflecting on the importance of character integrity and the notion of what actions are deemed morally impermissible.
Moral Philosophy and Absolute Prohibitions
The episode delves into the philosophical perspectives on absolute prohibitions within moral philosophy. It explores the distinction between acts deemed inherently wrong versus those judged based on circumstances, illustrating the nuanced considerations involved in ethical decision-making. The conversation touches upon the application of moral laws in defining prohibited acts and the intricate analysis required to differentiate between central cases of prohibitive behaviors and situational complexities. Additionally, the discussion contends with the epistemological challenges of categorizing actions as absolute prohibitions within ethical frameworks.