Exploring the misconceptions surrounding self-organization and its role in skill acquisition. Understanding the importance of aligning constraints with performance goals. Fascinating insights into flocking behavior in birds and its connection to self-organization. Exploring the difference between self-organization and self-regulation in sports. The role of goal setting and practice plans in promoting self-organization in learning.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Self-organization occurs under constraints, optimizing behavior relative to the constraints imposed on athletes rather than strict performance criteria.
Coaching for self-organization requires intentional manipulation and adjustment of constraints to shape the self-organizing process, not simply letting athletes figure things out on their own.
Deep dives
Misunderstanding of Self-Organization
The term self-organization is often misunderstood in the coaching and movement science community. This confusion arises from the word 'self' and its implied connotations of explicit, top-down control. Some interpret self-organization as athletes figuring out motor programs and mental models on their own, without guidance from coaches. This misconception leads to two problems: the belief that self-organization means completely hands-off coaching, and the assumption that athletes will always optimize their movements relative to externally defined outcome criteria. In reality, self-organization occurs under constraints, optimizing behavior relative to the constraints imposed on the athletes rather than strict performance criteria.
The Importance of Constraints
Self-organization does not occur in isolation; it happens under specific constraints. Constraints play a crucial role in guiding self-organization towards effective solutions. When designing coaching methods to promote self-organization, coaches must align the constraints with the desired performance criteria. Removing constraints that hinder self-organization and introducing new ones that guide athletes towards optimal movement solutions are essential steps in the coaching process. Coaching for self-organization is not simply letting athletes figure things out on their own; it requires intentional manipulation and adjustment of constraints to shape the self-organizing process.
Self-Organization vs. Self-Regulation
Self-organization and self-regulation are distinct concepts in sports. Self-organization refers to the coordination of degrees of freedom and movement, while self-regulation involves an athlete's ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate practice activities to achieve specific performance goals. These aspects of self-regulation can emerge from self-organization processes, but they are not the same. Self-organization focuses on the control of movement based on perceptual information, while self-regulation involves goal-setting, strategic planning, and evaluation of performance outcomes. Understanding the difference between these concepts is crucial for effective coaching and skill acquisition.
What is the role of the “self” in self organization? How does its pre-loaded conception lead to some misunderstanding about self-organization and misapplication of methods designed to promote it, like the CLA? How does it relate to self-regulation in skill acquisition? An attempt at some clarification.