The Daily cover image

The Daily

A Law Used Against the Mafia — and Now Trump

Aug 15, 2023
Richard Fausset, a New York Times correspondent based in Atlanta, discusses the recent indictment of Donald Trump and 18 others for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The podcast explores the charges related to racketeering, the potential impact on higher-level figures, the organized criminal unit behind the mission, and the challenges of migration in the Darien Gap. It also highlights the significance of a state charge for a former president, the potential timeline of the trial, and speculates on how the court systems will handle multiple criminal trials involving Trump.
22:27

Episode guests

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • The indictment against Donald Trump and his associates in Georgia includes a charge of racketeering, enabling prosecutors to hold all members of the group accountable for acts committed in furtherance of the conspiracy.
  • The use of the RICO statute in the case allows prosecutors to introduce a wide range of evidence and present a comprehensive narrative of a corrupt scheme aimed at overturning the election results, posing a significant legal challenge to Trump and his allies.

Deep dives

Georgia Indicts Trump and Associates for Election Conspiracy

In the state of Georgia, a Fulton County grand jury has returned an indictment charging Donald Trump and 18 of his associates with violations of Georgia law in relation to a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The indictment alleges that Trump and his co-conspirators refused to accept the election results and knowingly joined a corrupt scheme to unlawfully change the outcome in favor of Trump. The charges include felony racketeering, a serious crime in Georgia that carries potential prison sentences and fines. The indictment accuses Trump and his allies of committing various acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, such as pressuring election officials, making false statements, and attempting to manipulate electoral votes. The case is seen as significant because a state conviction cannot be pardoned by the president, potentially posing a serious legal threat to Trump.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode