Richard Fausset, a New York Times correspondent based in Atlanta, discusses the recent indictment of Donald Trump and 18 others for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The podcast explores the charges related to racketeering, the potential impact on higher-level figures, the organized criminal unit behind the mission, and the challenges of migration in the Darien Gap. It also highlights the significance of a state charge for a former president, the potential timeline of the trial, and speculates on how the court systems will handle multiple criminal trials involving Trump.
The indictment against Donald Trump and his associates in Georgia includes a charge of racketeering, enabling prosecutors to hold all members of the group accountable for acts committed in furtherance of the conspiracy.
The use of the RICO statute in the case allows prosecutors to introduce a wide range of evidence and present a comprehensive narrative of a corrupt scheme aimed at overturning the election results, posing a significant legal challenge to Trump and his allies.
Deep dives
Georgia Indicts Trump and Associates for Election Conspiracy
In the state of Georgia, a Fulton County grand jury has returned an indictment charging Donald Trump and 18 of his associates with violations of Georgia law in relation to a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The indictment alleges that Trump and his co-conspirators refused to accept the election results and knowingly joined a corrupt scheme to unlawfully change the outcome in favor of Trump. The charges include felony racketeering, a serious crime in Georgia that carries potential prison sentences and fines. The indictment accuses Trump and his allies of committing various acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, such as pressuring election officials, making false statements, and attempting to manipulate electoral votes. The case is seen as significant because a state conviction cannot be pardoned by the president, potentially posing a serious legal threat to Trump.
Racketeering and its Application to the Trump Indictment
The indictment against Donald Trump and his associates in Georgia includes a charge of racketeering, which is a legal concept used to tie together a group of individuals involved in a common illicit goal. Racketeering charges allow prosecutors to hold all members of the group accountable, even those who may not have directly participated in the most egregious actions. In this case, it is alleged that various individuals, from high-level lawyers like Rudy Giuliani to lower-level operatives, committed acts in furtherance of the conspiracy to overturn the election results. The racketeering framework allows prosecutors to demonstrate a pattern of illegal activity and to potentially pressure lower-level defendants to cooperate in order to build a stronger case against higher-profile individuals.
The Significance and Challenges of the Georgia Indictment
The indictment against Trump and his associates in Georgia is unique and unprecedented in many ways. It is rare to see a local prosecutor, such as Fani Willis in Fulton County, bring state charges against a former president, particularly in a case with such far-reaching implications and involvement of high-profile individuals. The use of the RICO statute in this case allows prosecutors to introduce a wide range of evidence and present a comprehensive narrative of a corrupt scheme aimed at overturning the election results. However, the broad scope of the case and the large number of defendants may lead to delays, complexity, and potential confusion for the jury. The outcome of this case remains uncertain, but it poses a significant legal challenge to Trump and his allies, with potential implications for their freedom and future legal battles.
On Monday, former President Donald J. Trump and 18 others were indicted by an Atlanta grand jury, with Mr. Trump and some of his former top aides accused of orchestrating a “criminal enterprise” to reverse the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.
Richard Fausset, who covers politics and culture in the American South for The Times, explains why, of all the charges piling up against Trump, this one may be the hardest to escape.
Guest: Richard Fausset, a New York Times correspondent based in Atlanta.
Background reading:
A grand jury in Georgia indicted the former president and 18 allies on multiple charges related to a conspiracy to subvert the will of voters.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode